SAPROPHYTIC SOIL MICROFLORA IN RELATION TO YIELD REDUCTIONS IN SOIL REPEATEDLY CROPPED WITH BARLEY (HORDEUM-VULGARE L)

被引:12
作者
ALSTROM, S
机构
[1] Department of Plant and Forest Protection, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, S-75007
关键词
BARLEY; DELETERIOUS EFFECTS; MICROBIAL INOCULATION; MONOCULTURE; SOIL BACTERIA; HORDEUM-VULGARE; CROP ROTATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00336265
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The yield-depressing effect due to repeated cropping (monoculture) of barley reported from long-term field experiments was observed as a reduction in plant growth in short-term pot experiments. The nature of the monoculture effect was investigated by mixing field soils with different cropping histories in different proportions in the greenhouse, while the influence of rhizosphere microflora from the monocultured and crop rotation soils on barley growth was studied in gnotobiotic experiments. Indigenous bacterial populations and the pH of the test soils were also measured. Significantly more bacteria were found in the crop rotation soil compared to the monocultured soil, but the two soils did not differ in pH. Greenhouse experiments showed that in the monocultured soil, seed germination was delayed and plant dry weight reduced, and that these effects had a biological origin. Attempts were also made to induce the monoculture effect in the crop rotation soil by inoculation with known harmful bacteria. The results from the experiments with mixed soils and with soil inoculation indicated that where crop rotation was practised the soil was more sensitive to bacterial effects than the monocultured soil. The rhizosphere microflora from the monocultured soil did not affect plant weights in short-term gnotobiotic experiments, but it significantly stimulated the number of lateral roots compared with the crop rotation microflora. This stimulation could not be related to differences in bacterial counts, Ph, or ion concentrations in the plant-growing medium.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 150
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Alstrom S, 1987, THESIS SWEDISH U AGR, V14
[2]   WHEAT CULTIVAR REACTIONS TO DELETERIOUS RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA UNDER GNOTOBIOTIC CONDITIONS [J].
ASTROM, B ;
GERHARDSON, B .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1989, 117 (02) :157-165
[3]   DIFFERENTIAL REACTIONS OF WHEAT AND PEA GENOTYPES TO ROOT INOCULATION WITH GROWTH-AFFECTING RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA [J].
ASTROM, B ;
GERHARDSON, B .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1988, 109 (02) :263-269
[4]  
BALDOCK JO, 1981, AGRON J, V73, P855
[5]  
BROWN PE, 1912, RES B IOWA STATE COL, V6
[6]   INHIBITION OF GROWTH IN CANOLA SEEDLINGS CAUSED BY AN OPPORTUNISTIC PSEUDOMONAS SP UNDER LABORATORY AND FIELD CONDITIONS [J].
CAMPBELL, JN ;
CONN, K ;
SORLIE, L ;
COOK, FD .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 32 (03) :201-207
[7]   PSEUDOMONADS AS A FACTOR IN THE GROWTH OF WINTER-WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM L) [J].
ELLIOTT, LF ;
LYNCH, JM .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1984, 16 (01) :69-71
[8]  
GUTSER R, 1981, LANDWIRTSCH FORSCH S, V38, P693
[9]   VISUAL QUANTIFICATION OF WHEAT DEVELOPMENT [J].
HAUN, JR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1973, 65 (01) :116-119
[10]  
Hewitt EJ, 1952, COMMONW AGR BUR