EFFECT OF NEEDLE CHANGING AND INTRAVENOUS CANNULA COLLECTION ON BLOOD CULTURE CONTAMINATION RATES

被引:20
作者
SMART, D [1 ]
BAGGOLEY, C [1 ]
HEAD, J [1 ]
NOBLE, D [1 ]
WETHERALL, B [1 ]
GORDON, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] FLINDERS UNIV S AUSTRALIA,MED CTR,DEPT MICROBIOL & INFECT DIS,BEDFORD PK,SA 5042,AUSTRALIA
关键词
blood culture; contamination venipuncture;
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(05)80983-7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: We tested the hypotheses that blood culture positivity and contamination rates were not increased by not changing needles between venipuncture and inoculation of blood culture bottles or by taking blood for culture by freshly inserted IV cannulae. Design: A prospective study of blood cultures collected by venipuncture or IV cannulae taken from an emergency department population. Venipuncture samples were randomized into needle change (standard method) or no needle change before inoculation into blood culture bottles. Participants: Nine hundred forty patients requiring blood cultures after assessment in the ED. Interventions: A standard disinfection procedure using 0.5% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol was used. Blood was collected by venipuncture and inoculated with or without needle change. Blood collected by IV cannula was inoculated with a fresh needle applied to the collection syringe. Measurements and main results: There was no statistically significant difference in contamination rates for blood collected by venipuncture with no needle change (6.4%) compared with needle change (4.2%, P > .30). No significant difference in contamination rates was noted for blood taken by freshly inserted IV cannulae (4.3%) compared with venipuncture with needle change after sampling (4.2%, P > .90). Some problems with randomization resulted in unequal numbers in the needle-change (286) versus no-needle-change (141) subgroups, and this may have introduced bias. A higher rate of pathogen growth was observed in blood taken by IV cannula (11.4%) compared with the standard method (6.3%) (P < .025). A significantly greater rate of Gram-negative sepsis was noted in the IV cannula group (6.6%) compared with direct venipuncture with needle change (1.1%) and no needle change (4.2%, P < .01). Conclusion: The results of this study do not support the practice of changing needles before inoculating blood samples into blood culture bottles. Collection of blood for culture through freshly inserted IV cannulae is associated with a low contamination rate and is and acceptable alternative to direct venipuncture. Sources of bias in this study suggest that further research is need to determine the optimal technique for collecting blood cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:1164 / 1168
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Scott, Blood-culture technique: Two needles or one?, Lancet, 1, (1979)
[2]  
Krumholz, Cummings, York, Blood culture phlebotomy: Switching needles does not prevent contamination, Ann Intern Med, 113, pp. 290-292, (1990)
[3]  
Isaacman, Karasic, Lack of effect of changing needles on contamination of blood cultures, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 9, pp. 274-277, (1990)
[4]  
Leisure, Moore, Schwartzman, Et al., Changing the needle when inoculating blood cultures: A no-benefit and high-risk procedure, JAMA, 264, pp. 2111-2112, (1990)
[5]  
Bryant, Strand, Reliability of blood cultures collected from intravascular catheter versus venipuncture, Am J Clin Pathol, 88, pp. 113-116, (1987)
[6]  
Shinozake, Deane, Mazuzan, Et al., Bacterial contamination of arterial lines A prospective study, JAMA, 249, pp. 223-225, (1983)
[7]  
Tafuro, Colburn, Gurevich, Et al., Comparison of blood cultures obtained simultaneously by venipuncture and from vascular lines, J Hosp Infect, 7, pp. 283-288, (1986)
[8]  
Tonnesen, Peuler, Lockwood, Cultures of blood drawn by catheter versus venipuncture, JAMA, 235, (1976)
[9]  
Isaacman, Karasic, Utility of collecting blood cultures through newly inserted intravenous catheters, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 9, pp. 815-818, (1990)