ORTHOTIC STABILIZATION OF THORACOLUMBAR INJURIES - A BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JEWETT HYPEREXTENSION ORTHOSIS

被引:30
作者
PATWARDHAN, AG
LI, SP
GAVIN, T
LORENZ, M
MEADE, KP
ZINDRICK, M
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood
[2] Rehabilitation Research and Development Center, V.A. Hospital, Hines
[3] Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago
[4] Research Design Inc, Orthotic and Prosthetic Center, Darien
[5] Hinsdale Orthopaedics Associates, Hinsdale, IL
关键词
Biomechanical stability; Deformity progression; Segmental stiffness; Spinal orthoses; Thoracolumbar injury;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199007000-00008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Spinal orthoses have been traditionally used in the management of thoracolumbar injuries treated with or without surgical stabilization. However, the orthotic treatment modality in the management of spinal fractures remains subjective since few objective data are available on the effectiveness of orthoses in stabilizing injured segments. This study used a finite element model of the spine to evaluate the effectiveness of a hyperextension orthosis in controlling the progression of deformities at the injury site under gravitational and flexion loads. Two types of injuries were simulated: a single-level injury at T12-L1 and a two-level injury at T11-T12-L1 segments. An injury, of increasing severity was simulated by progressively reducing the bending stiffness of the affected segments relative to the normal values in flexion-extension mode. The interaction of a three-point hyperextension orthosis with the spine was simulated using experimentally measured stiffness properties of the orthosis. The authors’ results suggest that in single-level injuries that cause up to 50% loss of segmental stiffness, the orthosis can restore normal resistance to deformity at the injured segments, under gravitational as well as large flexion loads. In loss of stiffness between 50% and 85% of normal, such as severe two-column disruptions, the orthosis can restore resistance to deformity under restricted patient activity level in the brace (low-flexion moment). Beyond 85% loss in segmental stiffness, such as three-column injuries, the orthosis alone appears to be ineffective in preventing progression of deformity. For two-level injuries that cause up to 25% loss of segmental stiffness, the orthosis can restore normal resistance to deformity at the injured segments, under gravitational as well as large flexion loads. In loss of stiffness between 25% and 60% of normal, such as two-column disruptions, the orthosis can restore resistance to deformity under restricted patient activity level in the brace (low-flexion moment). Beyond 60% loss in segmental stiffness, such as three-column injuries, the orthosis alone appears to be ineffective in preventing progression of deformity. © Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 661
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Agostoni E., Mognoni G., Torri G., MiserocchiG: Forces deforming the rib cage, Respiration Physiology, 2, pp. 105-117, (1966)
[2]  
Andriacchi T.P., Schultz A.B., Belytschko T.B., Galante J.O., A model for studies of mechanical interactions between the human spine and rib cage, J Biomechanics, 7, pp. 497-507, (1974)
[3]  
Cramer H.J., Liu Y.K., Von Rosenberg D.U., A distributed parameter model of the inertially loaded human spine, J Biomechanics, 9, pp. 115-130, (1976)
[4]  
Denis F., The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries, Spine, 8, (1983)
[5]  
Dickson J.H., Harrington P.R., Erwin W.D., Results of reduction and stabilization of the severely fractured thoracic and lumbar spine, J Bone Joint Surg, 60A, pp. 799-805, (1978)
[6]  
Dorsky S., Buchalter D., Kahanovitz N., Nordin M., A Three Dimensional Analysis of Lumbar Brace Immobilization Utilizing a Noninvasive Technique, (1987)
[7]  
Ferguson R.L., Tencer A.F., Woodard P., Allen B.L., Biomechanical comparisons of spinal fracture models and the stabilizing effects of posterior instrumentations, Spine, 13, pp. 453-460, (1988)
[8]  
Fidler M.W., Plasmans C., The effect of four types of support on the segmental mobility of the lumbosacral Spine, J Bone Joint Surg, 65A, pp. 943-947, (1983)
[9]  
Gertzbein S.D., Court-Brown C.M., The Rationale for Management of Flexion/ Distraction Injuries of the Thoracolumbar Spine Based on a New Classification, (1987)
[10]  
Ghista D.N., Viviani G.R., Subbaraj K., Lozada P.J., Srinivasan T.M., Barnes G., Biomechanical basis of optimal scoliosis surgical correction, J Biomechanics, 21, pp. 77-88, (1988)