FINAL REPORT OF THE GENERAL CLINICAL-RESULTS OF THE BRITISH-INSTITUTE-OF-RADIOLOGY FRACTIONATION STUDY OF 3F/WK VERSUS 5F/WK IN RADIOTHERAPY OF CARCINOMA OF THE LARYNGOPHARYNX

被引:29
作者
WIERNIK, G
BATES, TD
BLEEHEN, NM
BRINDLE, JM
BULLIMORE, J
FOWLER, JF
HAYBITTLE, JL
HOWARD, N
LAING, AH
LINDUP, R
MCGURK, F
PHILLIPS, DL
REZVANI, M
机构
[1] British Institute of Radiology, Publications Office, London W1N 4AT
关键词
D O I
10.1259/0007-1285-63-747-169
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The 10 year follow-up of a clinical trial involving the comparison of 3F/wk versus 5F/wk in radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx has now been completed. The trial involved an intake of 734 patients between 1966 and 1975. The classification of all patients has been revised to conform with the latest TNM publication. A reduction in total dose was made for 3F/wk compared with 5F/wk. This varied between 13% and 11% in centres treating over 3 weeks and 6 weeks, respectively. No statistically significant differences have been found between the two arms (3F/wk versus 5F/wk) of the trial in any of the main group analyses. A number of sub-group analyses relating to survival, tumour-free and laryngectomy-free rates and to the comparison of acute or late normal-tisue radiation damage have also been performed. No differences have been found that could be considered to be statistically significant in relation to the particular sub-group. Previous interim reports suggested minor differences in sub-group analyses between the 3F/wk and 5F/wk regimes in this trial; these have diminished now that the full follow-up data are available. This trial has provided evidence on which clinicians may base their choice between either a 3F/wk fractionation regime or a conventional 5F/wk treatment protocol in the treatment of carcinoma of the laryngo-pharynx.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   STAGING OF CERVICAL LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS - COMPARISON OF 2 SYSTEMS [J].
JOHNS, ME ;
NEAL, DA ;
CANTRELL, RW .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1984, 93 (04) :330-333
[12]  
LEDERMAN M, 1970, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V8, P867
[13]  
MANTEL NATHAN, 1966, CANCERCHEMOTHERAP REP, V50, P163
[14]   PHYSICAL AND CLINICAL PARAMETERS IN MANAGEMENT OF ADVANCED BREAST CANCER WITH RADIATION THERAPY ALONE [J].
MONTAGUE, ED .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY RADIUM THERAPY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1967, 99 (04) :995-&
[15]   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE - CURRENT ISSUES IN THE DESIGN AND INTERPRETATION OF CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
POCOCK, SJ .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 290 (6461) :39-42
[16]   STATISTICAL PROBLEMS IN THE REPORTING OF CLINICAL-TRIALS - A SURVEY OF 3 MEDICAL JOURNALS [J].
POCOCK, SJ ;
HUGHES, MD ;
LEE, RJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (07) :426-432
[17]   A COMPARISON OF THE NORMAL-TISSUE REACTIONS IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH EITHER 3F/WK OR 5F/WK IN THE BIR TRIAL OF RADIOTHERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE LARYNGO-PHARYNX [J].
REZVANI, M ;
ALCOCK, CJ ;
FOWLER, JF ;
HAYBITTLE, JL ;
HOPEWELL, JW ;
WIERNIK, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1989, 56 (05) :717-720
[18]  
REZVANI M, 1990, UNPUB INT J RAD ONCO
[19]   STEEPNESS OF DOSE-RESPONSE CURVE BOTH FOR TUMOR CURE AND NORMAL TISSUE INJURY [J].
STEWART, JG ;
JACKSON, AW .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1975, 85 (07) :1107-1111
[20]   SOME THOUGHTS ON CLINICAL-TRIALS, ESPECIALLY PROBLEMS OF MULTIPLICITY [J].
TUKEY, JW .
SCIENCE, 1977, 198 (4318) :679-684