COMPARISON OF 2 ALTERNATE METHODS TO ESTABLISH AN INTERRUPTED ENERGY ASSESSMENT RATE

[1] [Anonymous], 1979, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V98, P2047, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1979.319398

[2] BILLINTON R, 1982, U131 CAN EL ASS REP

[3] Billinton R., 1984, RELIABILITY EVALUATI, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-7731-7, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-7731-7]

[4] BILLINTON R, 1984, IEE ELECTRONICS MAR, P231

[5] BILLINTON R, 1985, P RAM C BALTIMORE

[6] NOFERI PL, 1975, 1975 P ANN REL MAINT

[7] WACKER G, 1983, JAN IEEE WINT POW M

[8] WACKER G, 1980, 3RD INT S LARG ENG S, P3

[9] WACKER G, 1985, P RAM C BALTIMORE

[10] WACKER G, 1984, JUN P INT ASS SCI TE

[1] [Anonymous], 1979, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V98, P2047, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1979.319398

[2] BILLINTON R, 1982, U131 CAN EL ASS REP

[3] Billinton R., 1984, RELIABILITY EVALUATI, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-7731-7, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-7731-7]

[4] BILLINTON R, 1984, IEE ELECTRONICS MAR, P231

[5] BILLINTON R, 1985, P RAM C BALTIMORE

[6] NOFERI PL, 1975, 1975 P ANN REL MAINT

[7] WACKER G, 1983, JAN IEEE WINT POW M

[8] WACKER G, 1980, 3RD INT S LARG ENG S, P3

[9] WACKER G, 1985, P RAM C BALTIMORE

[10] WACKER G, 1984, JUN P INT ASS SCI TE