OPIOID SUPPLEMENTATION TO PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA FOR OUTPATIENT ABORTION - A COMPARISON BETWEEN ALFENTANIL, FENTANYL AND PLACEBO

被引:23
作者
JAKOBSSON, J [1 ]
DAVIDSON, S [1 ]
ANDREEN, M [1 ]
WESTGREEN, M [1 ]
机构
[1] KAROLINSKA INST,DANDERYDS HOSP,DEPT GYNAECOL & OBSTET,S-18288 DANDERYD,SWEDEN
关键词
ANESTHESIA; INTRAVENOUS; PROPOFOL; ANALGESICS; FENTANYL; ALFENTANIL; COMPLICATIONS; NAUSEA; VOMITING;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03388.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
One hundred and sixty-four patients scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive one of three different supplements to propofol and oxygen in nitrous oxide anaesthesia: 0.1 mg fentanyl, 0.5 mg alfentanil or placebo. Postoperative pain and nausea, as well as complications during anaesthesia were studied. There were no differences in complications or complaints by surgeons during anaesthesia, and no patient in any group reacted unsatisfactorily to surgery. The patients in the placebo group consumed significantly more propofol during the procedure (P < 0.001). No differences were seen in time until hospital discharge between the three groups. Complaints about postoperative pain were significantly less frequent among patients receiving fentanyl (P < 0.01). The number of patients requesting postoperative analgetics, however, did not differ. There was no difference in the frequency of nausea or vomiting, but postoperative pain was found significantly to increase complaints of nausea (P < 0.01) and also time until hospital discharge (P < 0.01). In conclusion, opioid supplementation lowered the amount of propofol needed for anaesthesia. Alfentanil 0.5 mg did not improve the postoperative course. Fentanyl 0.1 mg decreased the frequency of postoperative pain without increasing the time to hospital discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 770
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   PAIN AS A MAJOR CAUSE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA [J].
ANDERSEN, R ;
KROHG, K .
CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1976, 23 (04) :366-369
[2]   A METHOD FOR THE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ANTIMETIC AGENTS [J].
BELLVILLE, JW ;
BROSS, IDJ ;
HOWLAND, WS .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1959, 20 (06) :753-760
[3]   NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
CLARKE, RSJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 56 (01) :19-27
[4]   RELIEF OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN - ADVANCES AWAITING APPLICATION [J].
COUSINS, MJ ;
MATHER, LE .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1989, 150 (07) :354-356
[5]   STUDY OF THE POSSIBLE INTERACTION BETWEEN FENTANYL AND PROPOFOL USING A COMPUTER-CONTROLLED INFUSION OF PROPOFOL [J].
DIXON, J ;
ROBERTS, FL ;
TACKLEY, RM ;
LEWIS, GTR ;
CONNELL, H ;
PRYSROBERTS, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 64 (02) :142-147
[6]   PROPOFOL NITROUS OXIDE VERSUS THIOPENTAL-ISOFLURANE NITROUS OXIDE FOR GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
DOZE, VA ;
SHAFER, A ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (01) :63-71
[7]   ANAESTHESIA AND PREMEDICATION AS FACTORS IN POSTOPERATIVE VOMITING [J].
DUNDEE, JW ;
KIRWAN, MJ ;
CLARKE, RSJ .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1965, 9 (04) :223-&
[8]  
Felts J A, 1990, J Clin Anesth, V2, P168, DOI 10.1016/0952-8180(90)90092-H
[9]   SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES TO 6 COMMON PREOPERATIVE MEDICATIONS [J].
FORREST, WH ;
BROWN, CR ;
BROWN, BW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1977, 47 (03) :241-247
[10]  
Gunawardene R D, 1988, Anaesthesia, V43 Suppl, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09074.x