行间生草条件下葡萄园土壤微生物、酶活性、养分的动态变化及相关性分析

被引:0
作者
龙妍
机构
[1] 西北农林科技大学
关键词
葡萄园; 土壤微生物; 土壤酶活性; 养分; 相关性;
D O I
暂无
年度学位
2007
学位类型
硕士
摘要
本文对陕西杨凌葡萄酒学院赤霞珠(Cabernet Sauvignon)葡萄试验园行间分别种植白三叶草(White clover, Trifolium repens L )、高羊茅(Tall fescue Festuca arundincea Schreb.)、紫花苜蓿(Alfalfa, Medicago sativa),在4、7、9、12月分别采集0~20 cm,20~40 cm,40~60cm土层的土壤进行土壤微生物、酶活性以及土壤养分的测定,得出变化规律与分布状况,并将生草与清耕间进行比较和相关性及主成分分析,其结果表明: 1葡萄园行间生草使土壤微生物数量明显高于清耕,且在各处理中微生物数量在土层中的分布均表现为0~20 cm>20~40 cm>40~60 cm。细菌最多,放线菌次之,纤维素分解菌最少。在各生草处理中微生物数量普遍在7月份达到最高。 2葡萄园行间生草使土壤酶活性较清耕有显著差异,且牧草种类的不同对土壤酶活性的影响不同。豆科牧草比禾本科牧草在提高蔗糖酶、磷酸酶、脲酶、纤维素酶活性方面的作用强,其中白三叶草在提高酶活性方面效果最好。禾本科牧草在提高土壤淀粉酶方面优于豆科牧草。 3白三叶草和紫花苜蓿使土壤有机质、全氮、碱解氮、速效钾含量较清耕有所提高,而高羊茅处理土壤中各肥力指标均较清耕有所下降。可见豆科牧草对土壤养分有一定的促进作用。 4土壤中养分含量、土壤微生物数量及酶活性三者间存在一定的正相关关系,在土壤评价中,土壤微生物、酶活性是极其重要的质量指标。在影响土壤肥力的各因素中碱解氮、速效钾、有机质、全氮、细菌、真菌、放线菌、固氮菌、纤维素分解菌、蔗糖酶、磷酸酶、脲酶与肥力水平关系最密切,被归为第一主成分,过氧化氢酶、全磷、全钾、速效磷、纤维素酶被归为第二主成分。表明了土壤微生物、酶、养分之间的相互依存、相互影响。
引用
收藏
页数:56
共 86 条
[1]
Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques [J].
Taylor, JP ;
Wilson, B ;
Mills, MS ;
Burns, RG .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 34 (03) :387-401
[2]
Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass [J].
García-Gil, JC ;
Plaza, C ;
Soler-Rovira, P ;
Polo, A .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 32 (13) :1907-1913
[3]
Purification and characterization of the first bacterial laccase in the rhizospheric bacterium Azospirillum lipoferum [J].
Diamantidis, G ;
Effosse, A ;
Potier, P ;
Bally, R .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 32 (07) :919-927
[4]
Systematic method for rating soil quality of conventional; organic; and integrated apple orchards in Washington State.[J].J.D. Glover;J.P. Reganold;P.K. Andrews.Agriculture; Ecosystems and Environment.2000, 1
[5]
Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality [J].
Doran, JW ;
Zeiss, MR .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2000, 15 (01) :3-11
[6]
Oxidoreductase enzymes liberated by plant roots and their effects on soil humic material [J].
Gramss, G ;
Voigt, KD ;
Kirsche, B .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1999, 38 (07) :1481-1494
[7]
Xylanase; invertase and protease at the soil–litter interface of a loamy sand.[J]..Soil Biology and Biochemistry.1999, 8
[8]
Laccase activity of forest litter [J].
Criquet, S ;
Tagger, S ;
Vogt, G ;
Iacazio, G ;
Le Petit, J .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 31 (09) :1239-1244
[9]
Effect of simple phenolic compounds of heather (Calluna vulgaris) on rumen microbial activity in vitro [J].
Murray, AH ;
Iason, GR ;
Stewart, C .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 22 (08) :1493-1504
[10]
ISOLATION OF SOIL STREPTOMYCES STRAINS CAPABLE OF DEGRADING HUMIC ACIDS AND ANALYSIS OF THEIR PEROXIDASE-ACTIVITY [J].
DARI, K ;
BECHET, M ;
BLONDEAU, R .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 1995, 16 (02) :115-121