THE EFFECTS OF A CAREER-LADDER PROGRAM ON SCHOOL ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS

被引:8
作者
EBMEIER, H [1 ]
HART, AW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV UTAH,DEPT EDUC ADM,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84112
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1164412
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Work redesign has recently gained attention as a possible solution for widely perceived deficiencies in the educational system. Two such strategies, reward and work structures, are often suggested as alterations in teachers' work lives that can have a positive impact on their professionalism and ultimately the lives of children. These concepts are often included in state-sponsored career-ladder plans. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of an investigation into the impact of such a career-ladder system on outcome measures widely suggested as intermediate indicators of school effectiveness and teacher satisfaction. Data were collected from 12 schools that had implemented a career-ladder program characterized by alternative reward and work-structure incentives and 12 matching schools where such programs were absent. Survey items tapped teachers' and students' opinions about school-process behaviors suggested by school-effectiveness and work-redesign literature as important for overall school and teacher health. Intermediate outcome data-on motivation, self-concept, academic futility, self-reliance, and school norms-were also collected to assess possible effects on students. Two results emerged from the data. First, when widely accepted school organizational processes are measured, the career-ladder program clearly demonstrates a positive impact on teachers and to a lesser extent on schools. Second, the career-ladder program had a differential effect on teachers at various stages of experience. Midcareer and new teachers felt more positive about the measured organizational processes within their schools than their counterparts in non-career-ladder schools. The results of this study support the utility of the work-design concept.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 281
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
AMSLER M, 1988, EVALUATION UTAH CARE
[2]  
Ashton P.T., 1986, MAKING DIFFERENCE TE
[3]  
Bidwell C., 1965, HDB ORG
[4]   THE INSTRUCTIONAL MANAGEMENT ROLE OF THE PRINCIPAL [J].
BOSSERT, ST ;
DWYER, DC ;
ROWAN, B ;
LEE, GV .
EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 1982, 18 (03) :34-64
[5]  
BOYLES N, 1986, PERFORMANCE BASED CO
[6]  
Brookover W., 1979, SCH SOCIAL SYSTEMS S
[7]  
BURKE BT, 1982, PHI DELTA KAPPAN, V64, P265
[8]  
*CARN FOR ED EC, 1986, NAT PREP TEACH 21ST
[9]   THE SCHOOL WORK-ENVIRONMENT AND TEACHER CAREER DISSATISFACTION [J].
CONLEY, SC ;
BACHARACH, SB ;
BAUER, S .
EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 1989, 25 (01) :58-81
[10]  
CONLEY SC, 1992, APR ANN M AM ED RES