THE EFFECTS OF A CAREER-LADDER PROGRAM ON SCHOOL ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS

被引:8
作者
EBMEIER, H [1 ]
HART, AW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV UTAH,DEPT EDUC ADM,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84112
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1164412
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Work redesign has recently gained attention as a possible solution for widely perceived deficiencies in the educational system. Two such strategies, reward and work structures, are often suggested as alterations in teachers' work lives that can have a positive impact on their professionalism and ultimately the lives of children. These concepts are often included in state-sponsored career-ladder plans. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of an investigation into the impact of such a career-ladder system on outcome measures widely suggested as intermediate indicators of school effectiveness and teacher satisfaction. Data were collected from 12 schools that had implemented a career-ladder program characterized by alternative reward and work-structure incentives and 12 matching schools where such programs were absent. Survey items tapped teachers' and students' opinions about school-process behaviors suggested by school-effectiveness and work-redesign literature as important for overall school and teacher health. Intermediate outcome data-on motivation, self-concept, academic futility, self-reliance, and school norms-were also collected to assess possible effects on students. Two results emerged from the data. First, when widely accepted school organizational processes are measured, the career-ladder program clearly demonstrates a positive impact on teachers and to a lesser extent on schools. Second, the career-ladder program had a differential effect on teachers at various stages of experience. Midcareer and new teachers felt more positive about the measured organizational processes within their schools than their counterparts in non-career-ladder schools. The results of this study support the utility of the work-design concept.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 281
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
CORNETT L, 1985, CAREER LADDER PLANS
[12]  
EBMEIER H, 1979, AM EDUC RES J, V16, P1
[13]   THE DEVELOPMENT AND FIELD-TEST OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR CLIENT-BASED PRINCIPAL FORMATIVE EVALUATION [J].
EBMEIER, H .
JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL EVALUATION IN EDUCATION, 1991, 4 (03) :245-278
[14]  
EDMONDS R, 1979, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V37, P15
[15]  
Festinger L., 1957, THEORY COGNITIVE DIS
[16]  
Hackman J., 1980, WORK REDESIGN, V6, DOI 10.2307/257655
[17]   ASSESSING THE INSTRUCTIONAL MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOR OF PRINCIPALS [J].
HALLINGER, P ;
MURPHY, J .
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 1985, 86 (02) :217-247
[19]  
HART AW, 1987, AM EDUC RES J, V24, P479
[20]   NEW TEACHERS REACT TO REDESIGNED TEACHER WORK [J].
HART, AW ;
MURPHY, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 1990, 98 (03) :224-250