CROSS-ENTROPY FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY OF A FUZZY LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH FUZZY GROUND DATA

被引:65
作者
FOODY, GM
机构
[1] Department of Geography, University of Wales, Swansea, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Singleton Park
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0924-2716(95)90116-V
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Fuzzy classifications have been used to represent land cover when pixels may have multiple and partial class membership. A fuzzy classification can be derived by softening the output of a conventional ''hard'' classification. Thus, for example, the probabilities of class membership may be derived from a conventional probability-based classification and mapped to represent the land cover of a site. The accuracy of the representation provided by a fuzzy classification is, however, difficult to evaluate. Conventional measures of classification accuracy cannot be used since they are appropriate only for ''hard'' classifications. The accuracy of a classification may, however, be indicated by the way in which the probability of class membership is partitioned between the classes and this may be expressed by entropy measures. Here cross-entropy is proposed as a means of evaluating the accuracy of a fuzzy classification, by illustrating how closely a fuzzy classification represents land cover when multiple and partial class membership is a feature of both the remotely sensed and ground data sets. Cross-entropy is calculated from the probability distributions of class membership derived from the remotely sensed and ground data sets. The use of cross-entropy as an indicator of classification accuracy was investigated with reference to land cover classifications of two contrasting test sites. The results show that cross-entropy may be used to indicate the accuracy of the representation of land cover when the classification of the remotely sensed data and ground data are both fuzzy.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Altman, Fuzzy set theoretic approaches for handling imprecision in spatial analysis, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., 8, pp. 271-289, (1994)
[2]  
Aronoff, The minimum accuracy value as an index of classification accuracy, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 51, pp. 593-600, (1985)
[3]  
Campbell, Introduction to Remote Sensing, (1987)
[4]  
Cohen, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, pp. 37-46, (1960)
[5]  
Cohen, Weighted kappa, Psychol. Bull., 70, pp. 213-220, (1968)
[6]  
Congalton, A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, pp. 35-46, (1981)
[7]  
Congalton, Accuracy assessment of remotely sensed data: future needs and directions, Proc. 12th Pecora Symp., pp. 385-388, (1994)
[8]  
Congalton, Oderwald, Mead, Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 49, pp. 1671-1678, (1983)
[9]  
Curran, Hay, The importance of measurement error for certain procedures in remote sensing at optical wavelengths, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 52, pp. 229-241, (1986)
[10]  
Curran, Williamson, The accuracy of ground data used in remote sensing investigations, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 6, pp. 1637-1651, (1985)