CROSS-ENTROPY FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY OF A FUZZY LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH FUZZY GROUND DATA

被引:65
作者
FOODY, GM
机构
[1] Department of Geography, University of Wales, Swansea, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Singleton Park
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0924-2716(95)90116-V
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Fuzzy classifications have been used to represent land cover when pixels may have multiple and partial class membership. A fuzzy classification can be derived by softening the output of a conventional ''hard'' classification. Thus, for example, the probabilities of class membership may be derived from a conventional probability-based classification and mapped to represent the land cover of a site. The accuracy of the representation provided by a fuzzy classification is, however, difficult to evaluate. Conventional measures of classification accuracy cannot be used since they are appropriate only for ''hard'' classifications. The accuracy of a classification may, however, be indicated by the way in which the probability of class membership is partitioned between the classes and this may be expressed by entropy measures. Here cross-entropy is proposed as a means of evaluating the accuracy of a fuzzy classification, by illustrating how closely a fuzzy classification represents land cover when multiple and partial class membership is a feature of both the remotely sensed and ground data sets. Cross-entropy is calculated from the probability distributions of class membership derived from the remotely sensed and ground data sets. The use of cross-entropy as an indicator of classification accuracy was investigated with reference to land cover classifications of two contrasting test sites. The results show that cross-entropy may be used to indicate the accuracy of the representation of land cover when the classification of the remotely sensed data and ground data are both fuzzy.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]  
Crapper, An estimate of the number of boundary cells in a mapped landscape coded to grid cells, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 50, pp. 1497-1503, (1984)
[12]  
DeFries, Townshend, Global land cover: comparison of ground-based data sets to classifications with AVHRR data, Environmental Remote Sensing from Regional to Global Scales, pp. 84-110, (1994)
[13]  
Estes, Mooneyhan, Of maps and myths, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 60, pp. 517-524, (1994)
[14]  
Finn, Use of the average mutual information index in evaluating classification error and consistency, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., 7, pp. 349-366, (1993)
[15]  
Foody, Classification accuracy assessment: some alternatives to the kappa coefficient for nominal and ordinal level classifications, Remote Sensing from Research to Operation, pp. 529-538, (1992)
[16]  
Foody, Cox, Sub-pixel land cover composition estimation using a linear mixture model and fuzzy membership functions, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 15, pp. 619-631, (1994)
[17]  
Foody, Trodd, Non-classifacatory analysis and representation of heathland vegetation from remotely sensed imagery, GeoJournal, 29, pp. 343-350, (1993)
[18]  
Foody, Campbell, Trodd, Wood, Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum likelihood classification, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 58, pp. 1335-1341, (1992)
[19]  
Gong, Howarth, The use of structural information for improving land-cover classification accuracies at the rural-urban fringe, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 56, pp. 67-73, (1990)
[20]  
Gopal, Woodcock, Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 60, pp. 181-188, (1994)