BENCHMARK FULL CONFIGURATION-INTERACTION CALCULATIONS ON THE HELIUM DIMER

被引:93
作者
VANMOURIK, T [1 ]
VANLENTHE, JH [1 ]
机构
[1] DEBYE INST, THEORET CHEM GRP, 3584 CH UTRECHT, NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.469060
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Full configuration interaction calculations are presented for the helium dimer employing large basis sets. Using the best basis, which contains up to h-type basis functions and several closely spaced sets of bond functions, the interaction energy was calculated for a variety of internuclear distances in the range 4.0 to 12.0 bohr. The best calculated values for the He2 interaction energy are -10.947 K at 5.6 bohr (the van der Waals minimum) and +294.90 K at 4.0 bohr (on the repulsive wall). The interaction energy at 4.0 bohr differs significantly from the most recent semiempirical potential of Aziz and Slaman [J. Chem. Phys. 94, 8047 (1991)], indicating that this potential is too attractive around 4.0 bohr. Using a more generally accessible basis, containing only up to f-type basis functions and only one set of bond functions, the interaction energy was calculated to be -10.903 K at 5.6 bohr and +294.96 K at 4.0 bohr. These results show that functions of higher than f symmetry and bond functions distributed over several centers are necessary for obtaining highly accurate results, particularly at the van der Waals minimum. Our results may be used to benchmark more approximate methods. The CCSD(T) method is estimated to underestimate the full CI interaction energy by 0.33 K at 5.6 bohr and by 2.0 K at 4.0 bohr. © 1995 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:7479 / 7483
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AHLRICHS R, 1983, METHODS COMPUTATIONA
[2]   AN EXACT QUANTUM MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF THE HELIUM HELIUM INTERMOLECULAR POTENTIAL [J].
ANDERSON, JB ;
TRAYNOR, CA ;
BOGHOSIAN, BM .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 99 (01) :345-351
[3]   AN EXAMINATION OF ABINITIO RESULTS FOR THE HELIUM POTENTIAL-ENERGY CURVE [J].
AZIZ, RA ;
SLAMAN, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 94 (12) :8047-8053
[4]  
AZIZ RA, IN PRESS PHYS REV LE
[5]  
Born M, 1927, ANN PHYS-BERLIN, V84, P0457
[6]   CALCULATION OF SMALL MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BY DIFFERENCES OF SEPARATE TOTAL ENERGIES - SOME PROCEDURES WITH REDUCED ERRORS [J].
BOYS, SF ;
BERNARDI, F .
MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 1970, 19 (04) :553-&
[7]   DIMER CENTERED BASIS SET IN THE CALCULATIONS OF THE 1ST-ORDER INTERACTION ENERGY WITH CI WAVEFUNCTION - THE HE DIMER [J].
CHALASINSKI, G ;
GUTOWSKI, M .
MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 1985, 54 (05) :1173-1184
[8]   ACCURACY OF THE BOYS AND BERNARDI FUNCTION COUNTERPOISE METHOD [J].
GUTOWSKI, M ;
VANDUIJNEVELDTVANDERIJDT, GC ;
VANLENTHE, JH ;
VANDUIJNEVELDT, FB .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 98 (06) :4728-4738
[9]   THE IMPACT OF HIGHER POLARIZATION FUNCTIONS ON 2ND-ORDER DISPERSION ENERGY - PARTIAL-WAVE EXPANSION AND DAMPING PHENOMENON FOR HE-2 [J].
GUTOWSKI, M ;
VERBEEK, J ;
VANLENTHE, JH ;
CHALASINSKI, G .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 111 (02) :271-283
[10]   A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY AND ACCURACY OF THE QUADRATIC CONFIGURATION-INTERACTION (QCISD), COUPLED CLUSTER (CCSD), AND BRUECKNER COUPLED CLUSTER (BCCD) METHODS [J].
HAMPEL, C ;
PETERSON, KA ;
WERNER, HJ .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1992, 190 (1-2) :1-12