GLASS POLYALKENOATE BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN AFTER CHEMOMECHANICAL CARIES REMOVAL

被引:22
作者
BURKE, FM
LYNCH, E
机构
[1] Department of Conservative Dentistry, London Hospital Medical College
关键词
GLASS POLYALKENOATE CEMENT; BOND STRENGTH; CHEMOMECHANICAL PREPARATION; CARIES;
D O I
10.1016/0300-5712(94)90061-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The bond strength of a glass polyalkenoate cement after chemomechanical caries removal of dentine with or without the use of a conditioning agent and the mode of bond failure using scanning electron microscopy was examined. Forty extracted carious human teeth were divided into four groups of ten. Conventional caries removal was carried out on two groups and chemomechanical caries removal on the other two groups. Surface conditioner was applied to the dentine in one conventionally treated and one chemomechanically treated group. Glass polyalkenoate cement was applied via a metal holder to the dentine. The samples were stored for 7 days in a moist environment at 37 degrees C. The samples were subjected to a shearing-type stress at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm min(-1). The mean bond strength for each group, in MPa (standard deviation), was: conventional caries removal alone 1.32 (0.51), conventional caries removal and conditioner application 2.43 (0.47), chemomechanical caries removal alone 2.47 (0.99) and chemomechanical caries removal and conditioner application 2.76 (0.96). Mean bond strengths for both the chemomechanically treated groups and the conventionally treated group, coupled with the use of the conditioning agent, were significantly greater than for the conventionally treated groups alone at the 0.05 level. There was no significant difference between the chemomechanically treated groups or the group conventionally treated with conditioner application. SEM examination revealed a combination of cohesive and adhesive bond failure. Different morphologies between the conventionally and chemomechanically treated surfaces were also evident.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 291
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC STRUCTURE OF 2 LAYERS OF CARIOUS DENTIN [J].
OHGUSHI, K ;
FUSAYAMA, T .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1975, 54 (05) :1019-1026
[32]  
OILO G, 1981, SCAND J DENT RES, V89, P344
[33]   IMPROVED ADHESION OF A GLASS IONOMER CEMENT TO DENTIN AND ENAMEL [J].
POWIS, DR ;
FOLLERAS, T ;
MERSON, SA ;
WILSON, AD .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1982, 61 (12) :1416-1422
[34]  
Robbins A, 1987, Gen Dent, V35, P392
[35]   COMPARATIVE INVITRO STUDY OF GK-101 AND GK-101E IN CARIES REMOVAL [J].
SCHUTZBANK, SG ;
GALAINI, J ;
KRONMAN, JH ;
GOLDMAN, M ;
CLARK, RE .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1978, 57 (9-10) :861-864
[36]   MAINTENANCE OF PULP VITALITY [J].
SHOVELTON, DS .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1972, 133 (03) :95-+
[37]  
Stanley HR, 1960, J AM DENT ASSOC, V61, P450
[38]   A CRITIQUE OF BOND STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS [J].
VANNOORT, R ;
NOROOZI, S ;
HOWARD, IC ;
CARDEW, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1989, 17 (02) :61-67
[39]   EVALUATION OF THE BONDING OF CERVICAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS [J].
VOUGIOUKLAKIS, G ;
SMITH, DC ;
LIPTON, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1982, 9 (03) :231-251
[40]   MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF POLY-ELECTROLYTE CEMENTS TO HYDROXYAPATITE [J].
WILSON, AD ;
PROSSER, HJ ;
POWIS, DM .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 62 (05) :590-592