How Can Social Enterprise Address Disadvantage? Evidence from an Inner City Community

被引:77
作者
Teasdale, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Third Sect Res Ctr, Pk House,40 Edgbaston Pk Rd, Birmingham B15 2RT, W Midlands, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
social enterprise; social exclusion; inner city;
D O I
10.1080/10495141003601278
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the potential impact of social enterprise on disadvantage. The case study research involved participant observation over a 2-year period. Selection of cases was based on a preliminary typology for social enterprise and disadvantage was conceptualized using the European concept of social exclusion. This sees exclusion as multidimensional and relative to the standards of the society in which a person lives. The existing research literature suggests that the aggregate economic impact of social enterprise upon exclusion is marginal. This is a consequence of a mismatch between policy expectations and what is happening in the field. This study found that different forms of social enterprise impacted on exclusion in different ways. This article outlines these different impacts in order to open up a more balanced perspective on the potential and limitation of social enterprise in combating disadvantage.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 107
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]  
Putnam R., 2000, BOWLING ALONE COLLAP
[32]   E pluribus unum:: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture [J].
Putnam, Robert D. .
SCANDINAVIAN POLITICAL STUDIES, 2007, 30 (02) :137-174
[33]  
Russell L., 2007, SOCIAL ENTERPRISE PR
[34]  
Samu S., 2001, J NONPROFIT PUBLIC S, V9, P45, DOI DOI 10.1300/J054V09N01
[35]  
Smallbone D., 2001, RES SOCIAL ENTERPRIS
[36]  
Smallbone D., 2005, 50 ICSB C WASH DC
[37]  
Westall A., 2001, VALUE LED MARKET DRI
[38]  
Woolcock M., 2001, ISUMA CANADIAN J POL, V2, P1
[39]  
Zietlow J. T., 2001, J NONPROFIT PUBLIC S, V9, P19, DOI DOI 10.1300/J054v09n01_03