FINE-STRUCTURE OF THE 2F(1)-F(2) ACOUSTIC DISTORTION-PRODUCT - CHANGES WITH PRIMARY LEVEL

被引:96
作者
HE, NJ
SCHMIEDT, RA
机构
[1] Department of Otolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.407350
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The fine frequency structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product (ADP fine structure) was examined in ten human subjects with normal hearing. Primary frequencies (f1 and f2) were incremented in steps of 1/32 octave with an f2/f1 ratio of 1.2. The primary levels were kept equal to each other and varied from 45 to 65 dB SPL in 2.5-dB steps. The results show that the ADP fine structure is characterized by a series of peaks and valleys across frequency, with a peak-to-peak frequency spacing of about 3/32 octave and a peak-to-valley amplitude ratio of up to 20 dB. At frequencies below 4000 Hz, as primary level increases, the sharpness of the ADP fine structure is not significantly reduced and the pattern gradually shifts to lower frequencies. At frequencies above 4000 Hz, a flattening of the pattern is sometimes observed at high levels. A consequence of the underlying process responsible for the fine structure is that ADP input/output (I/O) functions can be highly variable in shape. Dramatic shape changes can occur for ADP I/O functions-obtained with primary frequency changes of as little as 1/32nd of an octave. The outward cause of I/O function variability is the behavior of the ADP fine structure with level; i.e., it remains robust at high levels and systematically shifts to lower frequencies with level. As a result, ADP peaks can shift to valleys with increasing level and vice versa. Thus, small shifts in primary frequency can result in significant changes in the shape of the ADP I/O function in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:2659 / 2669
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
SUN X, 1993, ASS RES OT ABSTR, V16, P100
[32]   EVIDENCE FOR 2 DISCRETE SOURCES OF 2F1-F2 DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION IN RABBIT .1. DIFFERENTIAL DEPENDENCE ON STIMULUS PARAMETERS [J].
WHITEHEAD, ML ;
LONSBURYMARTIN, BL ;
MARTIN, GK .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (03) :1587-1607
[33]  
WIEDERHOLD ML, 1986, PERIPHERAL AUDITORY, P332
[34]  
Wilson J., 1980, Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Canadian Conference on Information Science
[36]   ANALYTICAL EXPRESSIONS FOR CRITICAL-BAND RATE AND CRITICAL BANDWIDTH AS A FUNCTION OF FREQUENCY [J].
ZWICKER, E ;
TERHARDT, E .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1980, 68 (05) :1523-1525
[37]   NON-MONOTIC BEHAVIOR OF (2F1-F2) EXPLAINED BY A SATURATION-FEEDBACK MODEL [J].
ZWICKER, E .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1980, 2 (3-4) :513-518
[39]   COCHLEAR PREPROCESSING IN ANALOG MODELS, IN DIGITAL MODELS AND IN HUMAN INNER-EAR [J].
ZWICKER, E ;
PEISL, W .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1990, 44 (2-3) :209-216
[40]   INTERRELATION OF DIFFERENT OTO-ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS [J].
ZWICKER, E ;
SCHLOTH, E .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1984, 75 (04) :1148-1154