WEBER AND NOISE ADAPTATION IN THE RETINA OF THE TOAD BUFO-MARINUS

被引:46
作者
DONNER, K
COPENHAGEN, DR
REUTER, T
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,SCH MED,DEPT OPHTHALMOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,SCH MED,DEPT PHYSIOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
关键词
D O I
10.1085/jgp.95.4.733
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Responses to flashes and steps of light were recorded intracellularly from rods and horizontal cells, and extracellularly from ganglion cells, in toad eyecups which were either dark adapted or exposed to various levels of background light. The average background intensities needed to depress the dark-adapted flash sensitivity by half in the three cell types, determined under identical conditions, were 0.9 Rh*s-1 (rods), 0.8 Rh*s-1 (horizontal cells), and 0.17 Rh*s-1 (ganglion cells), where Rh* denotes one isomerization per rod. Thus, there is a range (-0.7 log units) of weak backgrounds where the sensitivity (response amplitude/Rh*) of rods is not significantly affected, but where that of ganglion cells (1/threshold) is substantially reduced, which implies that the gain of the transmission from rods to the ganglion cell output is decreased. In this range, the ganglion cell threshold rises approximately as the square root of background intensity (i.e., in proportion to the quantai noise from the background), while the maintained rate of discharge stays constant. The threshold response of the cell will then signal light deviations (from a mean level) of constant statistical significance. We propose that this type of ganglion cell desensitization under dim backgrounds is due to a postreceptoral gain control driven by quantal fluctuations, and term it noise adaptation in contrast to the Weber adaptation (desensitization proportional to the mean background intensity) of rods, horizontal cells, and ganglion cells at higher background intensities. © 1990, Rockefeller University Press., All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 753
页数:21
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]   EVIDENCE FOR PASSIVE ELECTROTONIC INTERACTIONS IN RED RODS OF TOAD RETINA [J].
LEEPER, HF ;
NORMANN, RA ;
COPENHAGEN, DR .
NATURE, 1978, 275 (5677) :234-236
[42]  
LEIBOVIC KN, 1987, J NEUROSCI, V7, P1056
[43]  
MATURANA HUMBERTO R., 1960, JOUR GEN PHYSIOL, V43, P129, DOI 10.1085/jgp.43.6.129
[44]  
Reuter T, 1986, Neurosci Res Suppl, V4, pS163, DOI 10.1016/0168-0102(86)90081-7
[46]  
Rose A., 1942, PROC I RADIO ENG NEW, V30, P293, DOI [10.1109/jrproc.1942.230998, DOI 10.1109/JRPROC.1942.230998]
[47]   SCOTOPIC AND MESOPIC LIGHT ADAPTATION IN CATS RETINA [J].
SAKMANN, B ;
CREUTZFELDT, OD .
PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1969, 313 (02) :168-+
[48]  
SAKMANN B, 1972, VISUAL SYSTEM NEUROP, P87
[49]   RESPONSES OF SINGLE RODS IN RETINA OF TURTLE [J].
SCHWARTZ, EA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1973, 232 (03) :503-514
[50]  
Shapley R., 1984, PROGR RETINAL RES, V3, P263, DOI DOI 10.1016/0278-4327(84)90011-7