Improving Reassessment and Documentation of Pain Management

被引:50
作者
Gordon, Debra B. [1 ]
Rees, Susan M. [1 ]
McCausland, Maureen P. [1 ]
Pellino, Teresa A. [1 ]
Sanford-Ring, Sue [1 ]
Smith-Helmenstine, Jackie [1 ]
Danis, Dianne M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Hosp & Clin, Pain Management, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1553-7250(08)34065-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Joint Commission standards on pain management address the documentation of assessment and reassessment. Yet, little has been published to describe when and how nurses perform and communicate reassessment of pain. In 2005, the University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics (UWHC) was inconsistently reassessing pain after interventions, and documented reassessments were primarily confined to pain-intensity ratings. Plan-Do-Check-Act: A large-scale plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle was implemented to improve the documentation of pain reassessments, including development of an evidence-based administrative policy, repetitive education efforts with bedside coaching, changes in daily bedside documentation flow sheets, and audit and feedback. Results: From May 29, 2006, through July 16, 2008, a cumulative rate of 94.9% appropriately documented pain reassessments was achieved. Discussion: Despite implementation of an evidence-based policy to clarify requirements for pain reassessment, repetitive educational efforts, changes in daily bedside flow sheets, direct and extensive leadership involvement in the form of continuous bedside coaching, combined with more timely and persistent audit and feedback and clear accountability and alignment with goals, was necessary for substantial change. Strategies to sustain improvements include daily administrative and monthly staff documentation audits with prompt feedback to clinical nurse managers and staff. Nurses are instructed on the importance of pain reassessments and on the policy and specific documentation requirements. Reassessment of pain is a routine variable displayed on unit and departmental quality dashboards. Further study should examine if the intensity of this requirement for pain reassessment documentation ultimately facilitates the safety and effectiveness of pain management.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 517
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Pharmacodynamics of orally administered sustained-release hydromorphone in humans [J].
Angst, MS ;
Drover, DR ;
Lötsch, J ;
Ramaswamy, B ;
Naidu, S ;
Wada, DR ;
Stanski, DR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (01) :63-73
[2]   Nurses' reassessment of postoperative pain after analgesic administration [J].
Bucknall, Tracey ;
Manias, Elizabeth ;
Botti, Mari .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 23 (01) :1-7
[3]  
Carroll K C, 1999, Am J Crit Care, V8, P105
[4]   What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Africano, JM ;
Polo, R ;
Alcala, R ;
Carr, DB .
PAIN, 2003, 105 (1-2) :151-157
[5]  
Clinical Practice Guideline Working Group, 2001, MAN POST PAIN
[6]   Cancer pain management and the JCAHO's pain standards: An institutional challenge [J].
Cohen, MZ ;
Easley, MK ;
Ellis, C ;
Hughes, B ;
Ownby, K ;
Rude, M ;
Taft, E ;
Westbrooks, JB .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 25 (06) :519-527
[7]  
Dahl J. L., 2002, AM PAIN SOC B, V12, P11
[8]  
Detmer Sarah S, 2002, Semin Nurse Manag, V10, P189
[9]  
FARIES JE, 1991, CANCER NURS, V14, P306
[10]   What is clinically meaningful: Outcome measures in pain clinical trials [J].
Farrar, JT .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (02) :S106-S112