FORAGE QUALITY AND PATCH CHOICE BY WAPITI (CERVUS-ELAPHUS)

被引:181
作者
WILMSHURST, JF
FRYXELL, JM
HUDSON, RJ
机构
[1] Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph
[2] Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
CERVIDAE; CERVUS-ELAPHUS; DIGESTIBLE ENERGY; FORAGE MATURATION; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; GRASSES; HERBIVORY; PATCH CHOICE; WAPITI;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/6.2.209
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent models suggest that herbivores might optimize energy gain by selecting patches of intermediate vegetation biomass. We tested this hypothesis in wapiti (Cervus elaphus) by estimating daily rates of energy gain in relation to grass biomass and by measuring patch choice in experimental pastures in which grass biomass was manipulated by mowing. The digestible energy content of grasses declined with increasing biomass due to maturational changes in fiber and lignin content. Daily rates of dry matter intake by wapiti increased with grass biomass at a decelerating rate, implying a Type II functional response. Linking these values to published ad libitum energy intake and energy expenditure parameters, Fryxell's (1991) model predicted that the daily rate of energy gain should be highest when wapiti feed in grasslands with 1000-1100 kg/ha. In trials in which grass biomass within a mosaic of patches was manipulated experimentally between 800-2900 kg/ha, wapiti preferred patches of 1200 kg/ha, close to the value predicted by the energy gain model. Our results suggest that the rate of energy gain by wapiti is constrained by both grass biomass and grass fiber content, the latter of which varies inversely with grass biomass. Behavioral preference for grass patches of intermediate biomass and fiber content could help explain patterns of aggregation and seasonal migration reported previously for wapiti.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 217
页数:9
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Aebijcher N.J., Robe Mon P.A., Kenward R.E., Compos tional analysis of habitat tue from animal radio-tracking data, Ecology, 74, pp. 1315-1323, (1994)
[2]  
Al Bon S.D., Langvatn R., Plant phenology and the benefits of migration in a temperate ungulate, Oikos, pp. 65302-65513, (1992)
[3]  
Ammann A.P., Cowan R.L., Mothershead C.L., Baumgardt B.R., Dry matter and energy intake in relation to digestibility in white-tailed deer, J Wildl Manage, 37, pp. 195-201, (1973)
[4]  
Armstrong R.H., Common T.C., Smith H.K., The voluntary intake and in vivo digestibility of herbage harvested from indigenous hill plant communities, Grass Forage Sei, pp. 4133-4160, (1986)
[5]  
Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemisa, (1980)
[6]  
Baker D.E., Hobbs N.T., Strategies of digestion: Digestive efficiency and retention time of forage dieu in montane ungulates, Can J Zool, 65, pp. 1978-1984, (1987)
[7]  
Barton F.E., Amos H.E., Burdick D., Wilson R.E., Relationship of chemical analysis to in vitro digestibility for selected tropical and temperate grasses, J Anim Sei, pp. 43305-43513, (1976)
[8]  
Belovsky G.E., Diet optimizadon in a generalist herbivore: The moose, Theor Popul Biol, 14, pp. 103-134, (1978)
[9]  
Belovsky G.E., Optimal foraging and community structure: Implications for a guild of generalist grassland herbivores, Oecologia, 70, pp. 35-52, (1986)
[10]  
Blaster K.L., Wain Ma F.W., Wilson R.S., The regulation of food intake by sheep, Anim Prod, 3, pp. 51-61, (1961)