FORAGE QUALITY AND PATCH CHOICE BY WAPITI (CERVUS-ELAPHUS)

被引：181

作者：

WILMSHURST, JF

FRYXELL, JM

HUDSON, RJ

机构：

[1] Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph

[2] Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton

来源：

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY | 1995年 / 6卷 / 02期

基金：

加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;

关键词：

CERVIDAE; CERVUS-ELAPHUS; DIGESTIBLE ENERGY; FORAGE MATURATION; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; GRASSES; HERBIVORY; PATCH CHOICE; WAPITI;

D O I：

10.1093/beheco/6.2.209

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Recent models suggest that herbivores might optimize energy gain by selecting patches of intermediate vegetation biomass. We tested this hypothesis in wapiti (Cervus elaphus) by estimating daily rates of energy gain in relation to grass biomass and by measuring patch choice in experimental pastures in which grass biomass was manipulated by mowing. The digestible energy content of grasses declined with increasing biomass due to maturational changes in fiber and lignin content. Daily rates of dry matter intake by wapiti increased with grass biomass at a decelerating rate, implying a Type II functional response. Linking these values to published ad libitum energy intake and energy expenditure parameters, Fryxell's (1991) model predicted that the daily rate of energy gain should be highest when wapiti feed in grasslands with 1000-1100 kg/ha. In trials in which grass biomass within a mosaic of patches was manipulated experimentally between 800-2900 kg/ha, wapiti preferred patches of 1200 kg/ha, close to the value predicted by the energy gain model. Our results suggest that the rate of energy gain by wapiti is constrained by both grass biomass and grass fiber content, the latter of which varies inversely with grass biomass. Behavioral preference for grass patches of intermediate biomass and fiber content could help explain patterns of aggregation and seasonal migration reported previously for wapiti.

引用

页码：209 / 217

页数：9

共 83 条

[11]

Boyce M.S., The Jackson Elk Herd: Intensive Wildlife Management in North America, (1989)

[12]

Brazda A.R., Elk migration patterns, and some of the factors affecting movemenu in the Gallatin River drainage, Montana, J Wildl Manage, 17, pp. 9-23, (1953)

[13]

Broom D.M., Arnold G.W., Selection by grazing sheep of pasture plana at low herbage availability and responses of the planu to grazing, Austj Agric Res, pp. 37327-37538, (1986)

[14]

Chamov E.E., Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem, Theor Popul Biol, 9, pp. 129-136, (1976)

[15]

Clancy M., Bull L.S., Wangness P.J., Baumgardt B.E., Digestible energy intake of complete dieu by wethers and lactating ewes, J Anim Sd, 42, pp. 961-969, (1976)

[16]

Cook C.W., Mattox J.E., Harris L.E., Comparative daily consumption and digestibility of summer range forage by wet and dry ewes, J Anim Sei, 20, pp. 866-870, (1961)

[17]

Demment M.W., Van Soest P.J., A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores, Am Nat, 125, pp. 641-672, (1985)

[18]

Duncan P., Foose T.J., Gordon I.J., Gakahu C.G., Lloyde M., Comparative nutrient extraction from forages by grazing bovids and equids: A test of the nutritional model of equid/bovid competition and coexistence, Oecologia, 84, pp. 411-418, (1990)

[19]

Dutilleul P., Spatial heterogeneity and the design of ecological field experiments, Ecology, 74, pp. 1646-1658, (1993)

[20]

Estes R.D., Social organization of the African Bovidae, The Behaviour of Ungulates and Iu Relation to Management, pp. 166-205, (1974)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →