DIFFERENT MODES OF CELL-KILLING ACTION BETWEEN DNA TOPOISOMERASE-I AND TOPOISOMERASE-II INHIBITORS REVEALED BY KINETIC-ANALYSIS

被引:16
作者
INABA, M [1 ]
MITSUHASHI, J [1 ]
KAWADA, S [1 ]
NAKANO, H [1 ]
机构
[1] KYOWA HAKKO KOGYO CO LTD,TOKYO RES LABS,MACHIDA,TOKYO 194,JAPAN
来源
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH | 1994年 / 85卷 / 02期
关键词
DNA TOPOISOMERASE INHIBITOR; CAMPTOTHECIN; ETOPOSIDE; CELL KILLING ACTION; KINETIC ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1349-7006.1994.tb02081.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We compared the modes of cell-killing by DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors. The effects of camptothecin (CPT), KT-6528 and UCE6 upon colony formation by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase I, and of etoposide (VP-16), teniposide, amsacrine and UCT4-A as inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II were analyzed based upon a kinetic method that distinguishes between cell cycle phase-specific and -nonspecific agents. Human colorectal cancer WiDr cells were exposed to several concentrations of each agent for various periods and 90%-inhibitory concentrations (IC90) at each time were determined by means of a clonogenic assay. When exposure times and corresponding IC(90)s were plotted on a log-log scale, all inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II gave curves including a linear portion with a slope of - 1, which is characteristic of cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents. In contrast, the curves for all inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase I had a much steeper slope than - 1, which is typical of cell cycle phase-specific agents. In agreement with this finding, the cells were remarkably accumulated in the G(2)-M phase when exposed to VP-16, but in late S-phase when exposed to CPT as determined by a flow cytometric assay. These results indicated that the two classes of agents kill cells in a quite different manner although they are inhibitors of similar enzymes.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 193
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   CELL-DEATH INDUCED BY TOPOISOMERASE INHIBITORS - ROLE OF CALCIUM IN MAMMALIAN-CELLS [J].
BERTRAND, R ;
KERRIGAN, D ;
SARANG, M ;
POMMIER, Y .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 42 (01) :77-85
[2]  
CHOW KC, 1988, BIOCHEM PHARMACOL, V37, P1117
[3]  
DARPA P, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, P6919
[4]   UCE6, A NEW ANTITUMOR ANTIBIOTIC WITH TOPOISOMERASE-I MEDIATED DNA CLEAVAGE ACTIVITY, FROM ACTINOMYCETES [J].
FUJII, N ;
YAMASHITA, Y ;
CHIBA, S ;
UOSAKI, Y ;
SAITOH, Y ;
TUJI, Y ;
NAKANO, H .
JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS, 1993, 46 (07) :1173-1174
[5]   DOES BULK DAMAGE TO DNA EXPLAIN THE CYTOSTATIC AND CYTOTOXIC EFFECTS OF TOPOISOMERASE-II INHIBITORS [J].
GEWIRTZ, DA .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 42 (12) :2253-2258
[6]   DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF DNA TOPOISOMERASES-I AND TOPOISOMERASES-II DURING THE EUKARYOTIC CELL-CYCLE [J].
HECK, MMS ;
HITTELMAN, WN ;
EARNSHAW, WC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1988, 85 (04) :1086-1090
[7]  
HOLM C, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P6365
[8]  
HSIANG YH, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P3230
[9]  
HSIANG YH, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P5077
[10]   KINETIC-ANALYSIS OF 5-FLUOROURACIL ACTION AGAINST VARIOUS CANCER-CELLS [J].
INABA, M ;
MITSUHASHI, J ;
OZAWA, S .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 1990, 81 (10) :1039-1044