RELIABILITY OF THE E-TEST FOR DETECTION OF AMPICILLIN, VANCOMYCIN, AND HIGH-LEVEL AMINOGLYCOSIDE RESISTANCE IN ENTEROCOCCUS SPP

被引:40
作者
SCHULZ, JE
SAHM, DF
机构
[1] WASHINGTON UNIV,JEWISH HOSP ST LOUIS,MED CTR,DIV MICROBIOL & SEROL,ST LOUIS,MO 63110
[2] WASHINGTON UNIV,JEWISH HOSP ST LOUIS,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,ST LOUIS,MO 63110
[3] UNIV CHICAGO,MED CTR,CLIN MICROBIOL LABS,CHICAGO,IL 60637
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.31.12.3336-3339.1993
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
By comparison with apr dilution results, the E test was investigated for the ability to detect high-level aminoglycoside (gentamicin and streptomycin), ampicillin, and vancomycin resistance among strains representing six enterococcal species. For ampicillin and vancomycin, disk diffusion results also were obtained. No false high-level aminoglycoside resistance occurred, and no false gentamicin susceptibility was noted. With the high-range streptomycin E test (2,048 mug), 24% of the 38 resistant strains were falsely susceptible. However, these discordances could likely be reconciled by adjustments in incubation duration and by using broth microdilution rather than apr screen breakpoint criteria, or by using the lower-range (1,024-mug) strip. For ampicillin, category results obtained by E test and disk diffusion showed good agreement with agar dilation; E test MICs were generally comparable to agar dilution MICs. The E test was more sensitive than disk diffusion for detecting vancomycin-intermediate strains, but for these strains and those exhibiting low-level vancomycin resistance (MIC, 32 to 128 mug/ml), disk diffusion and E test inhibition zones must be interpreted with caution. Given the reliability of E test for detecting resistance to anti-enterococcal agents, the decision to use this method should be based on convenience, cost, testing frequency, and satisfaction with currently used methods.
引用
收藏
页码:3336 / 3339
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF THE E-TEST TO AGAR DILUTION, BROTH MICRODILUTION, AND AGAR DIFFUSION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING TECHNIQUES BY USING A SPECIAL CHALLENGE SET OF BACTERIA
    BAKER, CN
    STOCKER, SA
    CULVER, DH
    THORNSBERRY, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (03) : 533 - 538
  • [2] BOLMSTROM A, 1988, 28TH INT C ANT AG CH
  • [3] HIGH-LEVEL PENICILLIN RESISTANCE AMONG ISOLATES OF ENTEROCOCCI - IMPLICATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF ENTEROCOCCAL INFECTIONS
    BUSH, LM
    CALMON, J
    CHERNEY, CL
    WENDELER, M
    PITSAKIS, P
    POUPARD, J
    LEVISON, ME
    JOHNSON, CC
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 110 (07) : 515 - 520
  • [4] RESISTANCE OF ENTEROCOCCI TO GLYCOPEPTIDES
    COURVALIN, P
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 34 (12) : 2291 - 2296
  • [5] DOWNEY JF, 1992, 32ND INT C ANT AG CH
  • [6] IDENTIFICATION OF ENTEROCOCCUS SPECIES ISOLATED FROM HUMAN INFECTIONS BY A CONVENTIONAL TEST SCHEME
    FACKLAM, RR
    COLLINS, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1989, 27 (04) : 731 - 734
  • [7] INCREASING RESISTANCE TO BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICS AMONG CLINICAL ISOLATES OF ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECIUM - A 22-YEAR REVIEW AT ONE INSTITUTION
    GRAYSON, ML
    ELIOPOULOS, GM
    WENNERSTEN, CB
    RUOFF, KL
    DEGIROLAMI, PC
    FERRARO, MJ
    MOELLERING, RC
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 35 (11) : 2180 - 2184
  • [8] ACCURACY OF THE E-TEST FOR DETERMINING ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF STAPHYLOCOCCI, ENTEROCOCCI, CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI, AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA RESISTANT TO ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
    HUANG, MB
    BAKER, CN
    BANERJEE, S
    TENOVER, FC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (12) : 3243 - 3248
  • [9] RESISTANCE TO VANCOMYCIN AND TEICOPLANIN - AN EMERGING CLINICAL PROBLEM
    JOHNSON, AP
    UTTLEY, AHC
    WOODFORD, N
    GEORGE, RC
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1990, 3 (03) : 280 - 291
  • [10] SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CLINICAL ISOLATES OF ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECIUM AND ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS
    LOUIE, M
    SIMOR, AE
    SZETO, S
    PATEL, M
    KREISWIRTH, B
    LOW, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) : 41 - 45