INFLUENCE OF DETECTABILITY AND ABILITY TO ESCAPE ON NATURAL-SELECTION OF CONSPICUOUS AUTOTOMOUS DEFENSES

被引:41
作者
COOPER, WE
VITT, LJ
机构
[1] AUBURN UNIV,DEPT BIOL,MONTGOMERY,AL 36117
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,DEPT BIOL,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE | 1991年 / 69卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/z91-109
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Antipredatory adaptations in which a predator's attach is diverted to body parts that may be sacrificed or are less vulnerable sometimes depend upon the conspicuousness of the body part attacked. The predator's attention is drawn to the emphasized part, which serves as a decoy. Such defenses appear paradoxical in that they increase the probability of detection. However, they simultaneously increase the probability of postdetectional escape enough to decrease the overall probability of being killed. Based on probabilities of detection and of escape following detection, a simple model predicts the conditions in which autotomy and related defenses are favored. For a conspicuous decoy, equilibrium values of the increases in probabilities of detection and of escape following detection are given. Data on the conditional probability of escape after detection are discussed for the scincid lizards Eumeces fasiatus and E. laticeps, which have brightly colored autotomous tails. Versions of the model that split the predator-prey encounter into several successive stages are outlined briefly and illustrated by the data for the two lizard species. Strategies for measuring the probabilities and testing the model's predictions are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 764
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   THE FALSE HEAD HYPOTHESIS - PREDATION AND WING PATTERN VARIATION OF LYCAENID BUTTERFLIES [J].
ROBBINS, RK .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1981, 118 (05) :770-775
[32]   ATTACK AUTOTOMY - A DEFENSE AGAINST PREDATORS [J].
ROBINSON, MH ;
ABELE, LG ;
ROBINSON, B .
SCIENCE, 1970, 169 (3942) :300-&
[33]  
SILLENTULLBERG B, 1983, EVOLUTION, V37, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05627.x
[34]   TAIL LOSS, TAIL COLOR, AND PREDATOR ESCAPE IN EUMECES (LACERTILIA, SCINCIDAE) - AGE-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN COSTS AND BENEFITS [J].
VITT, LJ ;
COOPER, WE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1986, 64 (03) :583-592
[35]   FORAGING AND DIET OF A DIURNAL PREDATOR (EUMECES-LATICEPS) FEEDING ON HIDDEN PREY [J].
VITT, LJ ;
COOPER, WE .
JOURNAL OF HERPETOLOGY, 1986, 20 (03) :408-415
[36]  
Watt K.E.F., 1966, SYSTEMS ANAL ECOLOGY, P195, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-1-4832-3283-6.50014-5
[37]   THE PURSUIT DETERRENT FUNCTION OF ALARM SIGNALS [J].
WOODLAND, DJ ;
JAAFAR, Z ;
KNIGHT, ML .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1980, 115 (05) :748-753
[38]  
WOURMS MK, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P845, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00426.x
[39]  
[No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1086/284765