Polychotomous sample selection models include multinomial choice models and models with multiple rules for sample inclusion. The author analyzes two standard parametric approaches to selectivity bias correction in such models - the Lee and Generalized Heckman (GH) methods. The paper's main point is that Lee's approach, unlike GH, requires strong implicit restrictions on covariances between outcomes and selection indices. A Monte Carlo study demonstrates (1) that the Lee estimator exhibits significant bias when the data-generating process does not conform to its implicit covariance assumptions, and (2) that the GH estimator may have high variance due to multicollinearity between regressors.