DIMENSIONS OF PERSONALITY - 16, 5 OR 3 - CRITERIA FOR A TAXONOMIC PARADIGM

被引:428
作者
EYSENCK, HJ
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0191-8869(91)90144-Z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is suggested that what is needed in personality research is a paradigm which would give rise to coordinated research work ("normal science") directed in part at the elimination or clarification of anomalies. Several such paradigms have in fact been suggested, so that clearly what is needed is a set of criteria to decide between them. Several such criteria are put forward, and an attempt is made to apply them to three major systems, namely Cattell's 16 PF, the Norman "big 5", and the Eysenck PEN system. It is suggested that if agreement could be reached on these criteria, we might be able to approach agreement on the substantive issue of what are the major dimensions of personality. © 1991.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 790
页数:18
相关论文
共 156 条
[91]  
HOWARTH E, 1971, CANADIAN J BEHAVIOR, V4, P13
[92]  
John O. P., 1990, HDB PERSONALITY THEO, P66
[93]   THE FACTORS IN PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES AMONG NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
KLINE, P ;
BARRETT, P .
ADVANCES IN BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1983, 5 (3-4) :141-202
[94]  
Krige John, 1980, SCI REVOLUTION DISCO
[95]   A LARGE-SCALE CROSS-VALIDATION OF 2ND-ORDER PERSONALITY STRUCTURE DEFINED BY THE 16PF [J].
KRUG, SE ;
JOHNS, EF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1986, 59 (02) :683-693
[96]  
KRUG SE, 1986, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V46, P509
[97]  
KRUG SE, 1981, INTERPRETING 16 PF P
[98]  
Kuhn T.S., 1974, STRUCTURE SCI THEORI, P459
[99]  
Lakatos Imre., 1970, CRITICISM GROW KNOWL, P91, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139171434.009