ANTIHYPERGLYCEMIC EFFICACY, RESPONSE PREDICTION AND DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONS OF TREATMENT WITH METFORMIN AND SULFONYLUREA, ALONE AND IN PRIMARY COMBINATION

被引:73
作者
HERMANN, LS [1 ]
SCHERSTEN, B [1 ]
MELANDER, A [1 ]
机构
[1] LUND UNIV,DEPT COMMUNITY HLTH SCI,LUND,SWEDEN
关键词
TYPE; 2; DIABETES; METFORMIN; SULFONYLUREA; COMBINATION THERAPY; RESPONSE PREDICTORS; DOSE-RESPONSE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00253.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The short-term (2-12 weeks) antihyperglycaemic efficacy of metformin (M), glibenclamide (G), and their primary combination (MC) was assessed in a double-blind study including 165 unselected patients with Type 2 diabetes. Patients with diet failure were randomized to M, G or MG. The dose was titrated with a fasting blood glucose concentration (FBC) of < 6.7 mmol l(-1) as the target, using at most six dose levels, the first three comprising increasing monotherapy (M or G) or low-dose primary combination (MGL), and the second three add-on therapies (M/G and G/M) and primary combination therapy escalated to high dose (MGH). Success rates were higher on MGL than on monotherapy. The difference in achieving acceptable control (FBC less than or equal to 7.8 mmol 1(-1)) was 70 % versus 51 % (95 % confidence interval 3-36 %, p = 0.032). When the drugs were combined, a slightly greater FBG reduction (p = 0.026) was observed, at lower dosage (p = 0.013). The response could not be predicted from body weight, but depended upon initial FBG (p = 0.019) and meal-stimulated C-peptide (p = 0.007). FBC declined progressively with increasing doses of metformin, whereas glibenclamide exerted most of its effect at low dose. Primary combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea may be clinically useful.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 960
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]  
extensions of the Mantel‐Haenszel procedure, J Am Statistical Assoc, 58, pp. 690-700, (1963)
[22]  
Bradley JW., Distribution‐free Statistical Tests, pp. 68-86, (1968)
[23]  
Altman DG., Practical Statistics for Medical Research, pp. 336-358, (1991)
[24]  
Groop L., Widen E., Franssila-Kallunki A., Ekstrand A., Saloranta C., Schalin C., Et al., Different effects of insulin and oral antidiabetic agents on glucose and energy metabolism in type 2 (non‐insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus, Diabetologia, 32, pp. 599-605, (1989)
[25]  
Clarke BF, Duncan LJP., Biguanide treatment in the management of insulin independent (maturity‐onset) diabetes: clinical experience with metformin, Res Clin Forums, 1, pp. 53-63, (1979)
[26]  
Higginbotham L., Martin FJR., Double‐blind trial of metformin in the therapy of non‐ketotic diabetics, Med J Austr, 2, pp. 154-156, (1979)
[27]  
Trischitta V., Italia S., Mazzarino S., Buscema M., Rabuazzo AM, Sangiorgio L., Et al., Comparison of combined therapies in the treatment of secondary failure to glyburide, Diabetes Care, 15, pp. 539-542, (1992)
[28]  
Reaven GM, Johnston P., Hollenbeck CB, Skowronski R., Zhang JC, Goldfine JD, Et al., Combined metformin‐sulfonylurea treatment of patients with non‐insulin dependent diabetes in fair to poor glycaemic control, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 74, pp. 1020-1026, (1992)
[29]  
Holman RR, Steemson J., Turner RC., Sulphonylurea failure in type II diabetes: treatment with a basal insulin, Diabetic Med, 4, pp. 457-462, (1987)
[30]  
United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) VIII. Study design, progress and performance, Diabetologia, 34, pp. 877-890, (1991)