INTENSIVE SILVICULTURAL TREATMENT - IMPACTS ON SOIL FERTILITY AND PLANTED CONIFER RESPONSE

被引:112
作者
MUNSON, AD [1 ]
MARGOLIS, HA [1 ]
BRAND, DG [1 ]
机构
[1] FORESTRY CANADA, OTTAWA K1A 1G5, ON, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010043x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The impacts of intensive silvicultural treatment on soil processes and fertility, as well as nutrition and growth of planted eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] were examined 4 yr after planting and initial treatment. The impacts of three treatments, applied singly and in factorial combinations, were evaluated: (i) soil surface modification by scarification, (ii) fertilization, and (iii) vegetation control using herbicide. The most significant effects resulted from vegetation control. Nitrification increased significantly, soil total C and N declined, with accompanying decreases in soil pH and cation availability (K). With this same treatment, pine and spruce growth increased markedly in response to increases in light, moisture, and N. Scarification removed the nutrient reservoir in forest humus, resulting in decreased nutrient availability in the mineral soil, while fertilization had inconsistent effects on soil nutrient availability. However, neither scarification nor fertilization alone significantly affected growth; only their interactions with other treatments were important after 4 yr. During the period since planting, the effects of scarification and fertilization on conifer growth have declined, while effects of vegetation control have become much more prominent. The impact of losses of N and other nutrients as a result of vegetation control or scarification should become more evident as nutrient demand increases with plantation development.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 255
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO SILVICULTURAL INTERVENTION IN CONIFEROUS PLANTATION ECOSYSTEMS [J].
OHTONEN, R ;
MUNSON, A ;
BRAND, D .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1992, 2 (04) :363-375
[22]  
POWERS RF, 1990, SUSTAINED PRODUCTIVI, P47
[23]  
PRITCHETT WL, 1981, IMPAC67 U FLOR REP
[24]  
ROWE JS, 1972, PUBL CAN FOR SERV, V1300
[25]  
Squire R. O., 1983, Australian Forestry, V46, P83
[26]  
Timmer V. R., 1984, Forest soils and treatment impacts. Proceedings, Sixth North American Forest Soils Conference, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, June 1983, P335
[27]   COMPARATIVE FOLIAR ANALYSIS OF YOUNG BALSAM FIR FERTILIZED WITH NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND LIME [J].
TIMMER, VR ;
STONE, EL .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1978, 42 (01) :125-130
[28]  
VANLEAR DH, 1990, SUSTAINED PRODUCTIVI, P234
[29]   DISTURBANCE, NITROGEN AVAILABILITY, AND NITROGEN LOSSES IN AN INTENSIVELY MANAGED LOBLOLLY-PINE PLANTATION [J].
VITOUSEK, PM ;
MATSON, PA .
ECOLOGY, 1985, 66 (04) :1360-1376
[30]   A COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL NITRIFICATION AND NITRATE MOBILITY IN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS [J].
VITOUSEK, PM ;
GOSZ, JR ;
GRIER, CC ;
MELILLO, JM ;
REINERS, WA .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1982, 52 (02) :155-177