CONFIDENTIALITY ASSURANCES AND RESPONSE - A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW OF THE EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE

被引：98

作者：

SINGER, E ^{[1
]}

VONTHURN, DR ^{[1
]}

MILLER, ER ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] US BUR CENSUS,CTR SURVEY METHODS RES,WASHINGTON,DC 20233

来源：

PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY | 1995年 / 59卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1086/269458

中图分类号：

G2 [信息与知识传播];

学科分类号：

05 ; 0503 ;

摘要：

This article tests the general. hypothesis that a stronger assurance of confidentiality improves survey response by means of a meta-analysis of the experimental literature. No support is found for the general hypothesis, but the subsidiary hypothesis, that confidentiality assurances improve response when the data asked about are sensitive, is supported. Under those circumstances, the effect of confidentiality assurances is small but statistically significant and is robust in the presence of a variety of control variables.

引用

页码：66 / 77

页数：12

共 34 条

[11] INFORMED CONSENT - THE EFFECTS OF CLARITY AND SPECIFICITY ON DISCLOSURE IN A CLINICAL INTERVIEW [J].

HAUT, MW ;

MUEHLEMAN, T .

PSYCHOTHERAPY, 1986, 23 (01) :93-101

[12] THE INFLUENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY CONDITIONS ON SELF-DISCLOSURE OF EARLY ADOLESCENTS [J].

KOBOCOW, B ;

MCGUIRE, JM ;

BLAU, BI .

PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1983, 14 (04) :435-443

[13] DEPTH OF SELF-DISCLOSURE AS A FUNCTION OF ASSURED CONFIDENTIALITY AND VIDEOTAPE RECORDING [J].

MCGUIRE, JM ;

GRAVES, S ;

BLAU, B .

JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 1985, 64 (04) :259-263

[14] INFORMING CLIENTS ABOUT THE LIMITS TO CONFIDENTIALITY, RISKS, AND THEIR RIGHTS - IS SELF-DISCLOSURE INHIBITED [J].

MUEHLEMAN, T ;

PICKENS, BK ;

ROBINSON, F .

PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1985, 16 (03) :385-397

[15]

REAMER FG, 1979, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V43, P496

[16]

ROSENTHAL R, 1976, EXPT EFFECTS BEHAVIO

[17]

Rosenthal R., 1991, METAANALYTIC PROCEDU, DOI DOI 10.2307/1175262

[18] CONFIDENTIALITY ASSURANCES IN SURVEYS - REASSURANCE OR THREAT [J].

SINGER, E ;

HIPPLER, HJ ;

SCHWARZ, N .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 1992, 4 (03) :256-268

[19] INFORMED CONSENT - CONSEQUENCES FOR RESPONSE RATE AND RESPONSE QUALITY IN SOCIAL SURVEYS [J].

SINGER, E .

AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 43 (02) :144-162

[20] EFFECT OF INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES ON RESPONDENTS REACTIONS TO SURVEYS [J].

SINGER, E .

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1978, 5 (01) :49-57

← 1 2 3 4 →