A MULTIATTRIBUTE PREFERENCE MODEL FOR EVALUATING THE REFORESTATION CHAIN ALTERNATIVES OF A FOREST STAND

被引:49
作者
KANGAS, J
机构
[1] Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Research Station, SF-80101 Joensuu
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0378-1127(93)90007-A
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This paper presents a method, based on multi-attribute utility theory, for choosing the reforestation chain in a forest stand. The method is developed mainly for analysing and supporting the decision-making of non-industrial forest landowners. By using the decision analysis model, all kinds of objectives, qualitative as well as quantitative, can be analytically dealt with, and alternative reforestation chains can be evaluated with regard both to overall utility and to each specific objective. The decision alternative which maximises overall utility is recommended as most suitable. Values of reforestation chain alternatives with regard to an objective which cannot be measured reliably enough using quantitative production functions are determined via preference functions describing the importance of making sub-choices of chains and the desirabilities of sub-choice alternatives, with regard to the objective in question. Parameters of preference functions are estimated on the grounds of pairwise comparisons between decision elements, using the eigenvalue method as presented by T.L. Saaty. Timber production values are estimated on the basis of the discounted value of net revenues. Based on the interpretation of the parameters of the preference model as marginal rates of substitution, wide-ranging sensitivity analyses can be carried out, e.g. on the effects of changing the weighting of objectives on the ranking of decision alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 288
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   LIMITS AND EXTENSIONS OF EQUAL WEIGHTS IN ADDITIVE MULTIATTRIBUTE MODELS [J].
BARRON, FH .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1988, 68 (1-3) :141-152
[2]   DECISION-ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION - COMBINING INFORMATION AND PREFERENCES USING AQUINAS AND AXOTL [J].
BRADSHAW, JM ;
BOOSE, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1990, 32 (02) :121-186
[3]   REMARKS ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
DYER, JS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (03) :249-258
[4]   USE OF NONLINEAR, NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS AS A FUNCTION OF TASK AND AMOUNT OF INFORMATION [J].
EINHORN, HJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1971, 6 (01) :1-27
[5]  
FISCHHOFF B, 1980, COGNITIVE PROCESSES
[6]  
FOGEL M, 1988, RM161 USDA FOR SERV, P24
[7]  
FORMAN EH, 1986, EXPERT CHOICE MANUAL
[8]  
HAHTOLA K, 1973, ACTA FOR FENN, V130, P1
[9]   THE THEORY OF RATIO SCALE ESTIMATION - SAATY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
HARKER, PT ;
VARGAS, LG .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1987, 33 (11) :1383-1403
[10]   REMARKS ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS - REPLY [J].
HARKER, PT ;
VARGAS, LG .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (03) :269-273