SCALABLE DECISION RULES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT STUDIES - EFFECT SIZE, TYPE-I, AND TYPE-II ERRORS

被引:214
作者
MAPSTONE, BD [1 ]
机构
[1] GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PK AUTHOR, RES & MONITORING SECT, TOWNSVILLE, QLD 4810, AUSTRALIA
关键词
EFFECT SIZE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; STATISTICAL DECISIONS; STATISTICAL POWER; TYPE I ERROR; TYPE II ERROR;
D O I
10.2307/1942031
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Assessments of environmental impacts are being subject to greater scientific and legal scrutiny than ever before. The application of traditional statistical decision-making criteria to questions of environmental impacts has become increasingly inadequate as society demands greater environmental accountability from economic development. In particular, impact assessment has inherited a preoccupation with Type I error rates that has pervaded ecological research, even though Type II errors are often equally severe in impact assessment. Estimation of Type II error rates and specification of critical effect sizes-or the magnitudes of impacts considered important-are mutually dependent. Consideration of Type II errors, therefore, requires the exact specification of an hypothesized impact, which is often difficult. Insistence on low rates of Type I error (e.g., alpha = 0.05) typically means that equivalent rates of Type II error can be realized only when effect sizes (ES) are very large or when very many samples are taken. Rather than adhering to a fixed, arbitrary, critical, Type I error rate, I propose a procedure by which the critical ES is given primacy. Statistical decision criteria are then selected according to the relative weighting of the perceived consequences of Type I or Type II errors. The critical Type I error rate is set by iteration to some multiple (k) of the estimated potential for Type II error, and the null hypothesis is rejected if that (variable) Type I probability is not exceeded. The value of k would be determined by the ratio of the consequences (e.g., costs) of Type II and Type I errors. The procedure focuses attention on the magnitudes of impacts considered important, and provides for statistical decisions based on the a priori consideration of the development and environmental costs of Type I and Type II errors. It also provides incentive for development proponents to support rigorous environmental monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 410
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]  
SMITH MPL, 1991, AUST J MAR FRESH RES, V42, P603
[32]   CONSERVATION - TACTICS FOR A CONSTANT CRISIS [J].
SOULE, ME .
SCIENCE, 1991, 253 (5021) :744-750
[33]   ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT - PSEUDOREPLICATION IN TIME [J].
STEWARTOATEN, A ;
MURDOCH, WW ;
PARKER, KR .
ECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (04) :929-940
[34]   DETECTING COMMUNITY-WIDE PATTERNS - ESTIMATING POWER STRENGTHENS STATISTICAL-INFERENCE [J].
TOFT, CA ;
SHEA, PJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1983, 122 (05) :618-625
[35]   TOWARDS AN ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR INVESTIGATING POLLUTION [J].
UNDERWOOD, AJ ;
PETERSON, CH .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1988, 46 (1-3) :227-234
[36]   BEYOND BACI - EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGNS FOR DETECTING HUMAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ON TEMPORAL VARIATIONS IN NATURAL-POPULATIONS [J].
UNDERWOOD, AJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 1991, 42 (05) :569-587
[37]   EXPERIMENTS IN ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT - THEIR LOGICS, FUNCTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS [J].
UNDERWOOD, AJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1990, 15 (04) :365-389
[38]  
UNDERWOOD AJ, 1991, 29TH P C AUSTR SOC L, P105
[39]   A COMPARISON OF SOME METHODS FOR ANALYZING CHANGES IN BENTHIC COMMUNITY STRUCTURE [J].
WARWICK, RM ;
CLARKE, KR .
JOURNAL OF THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1991, 71 (01) :225-244