SCATTER COMPENSATION IN DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY USING THE POSTERIOR BEAM STOP TECHNIQUE

被引:29
作者
LO, JY [1 ]
FLOYD, CE [1 ]
BAKER, JA [1 ]
RAVIN, CE [1 ]
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT BIOMED ENGN,DURHAM,NC 27710
关键词
SCATTER RADIATION; DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY; PORTABLE BEDSIDE RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING;
D O I
10.1118/1.597388
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A new scatter compensation technique for computed radiography based on posterior beam stop (PBS) sampled scatter measurements and the bicubic spline interpolation technique was proposed. Using only a single exposure, both the clinical image and an array of scatter measurements, which were interpolated into a smooth scatter-only image, were simultaneously acquired. The scatter was subtracted from the clinical image to generate the primary-only image. To gauge the accuracy of scatter estimation, both quantitative and interpolation errors were evaluated. The PBS measurements were compared against the standard beam stop method at 16 locations in an anatomical phantom, resulting in quantitative errors of 2.7% relative to the scatter or 6.8% relative to the primary. Also measured were the interpolation error over 64 interpolation sample locations and 64 midpoint sample locations in the anatomical phantom. The combined interpolation error was 1.9% relative to the scatter or 8.0% relative to the primary. At the interpolation sample locations, the errors were identical between the phantom radiograph and digital portable chest radiographs from five patients. By summing the quantitative and interpolation errors in quadrature, the overall error of the PBS SISTER (scatter interpolation-subtraction technique for radiography) method was 3.3% relative to the scatter or 10% relative to the primary, which was adequate for dual-energy imaging purposes (less than 10% error relative to the scatter or 20% relative to the primary). The change of image contrast, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at six locations in the anatomical phantom were quantitatively analyzed. Contrast and noise were equally enhanced in all anatomical regions, resulting in approximately the same SNR before and after compensation. The average contrast over all six locations increased 2.8 times, average noise increased 4.9 times, and average SNR barely decreased to 99%. This technique therefore provided accurate scatter compensation by custom measurements of each patient, preserved the SNR, required only one exposure with no dose increase, and performed at low computational cost.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 443
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, NUMERICAL RECIPES
[2]   OBSERVER EVALUATION OF SCATTER SUBTRACTION FOR DIGITAL PORTABLE CHEST RADIOGRAPHS [J].
BAKER, JA ;
FLOYD, CE ;
LO, JY ;
RAVIN, CE .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1993, 28 (08) :667-670
[3]   STUDIES OF PERFORMANCE OF ANTISCATTER GRIDS IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY - EFFECT ON SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO [J].
CHAN, HP ;
LAM, KL ;
WU, YZ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (04) :655-664
[4]  
CURRY TS, 1990, CHRISTENSENS INTRO P
[5]   VARIABLE COMPENSATION TECHNIQUE FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY OF THE CHEST [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
POWELL, AO .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (02) :451-458
[6]   SINGLE-EXPOSURE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY - IMPROVED DETECTION AND PROCESSING [J].
ERGUN, DL ;
MISTRETTA, CA ;
BROWN, DE ;
BYSTRIANYK, RT ;
SZE, WK ;
KELCZ, F ;
NAIDICH, DP .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (01) :243-249
[7]   SCATTER COMPENSATION FOR DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY USING MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION [J].
FLOYD, CE ;
BAYDUSH, AH ;
LO, JY ;
BOWSHER, JE ;
RAVIN, CE .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1993, 28 (05) :427-433
[8]   QUANTITATIVE SCATTER MEASUREMENT IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY USING A PHOTOSTIMULABLE PHOSPHOR IMAGING-SYSTEM [J].
FLOYD, CE ;
LO, JY ;
CHOTAS, HG ;
RAVIN, CE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (03) :408-413
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF SCATTER FRACTIONS IN CLINICAL BEDSIDE RADIOGRAPHY [J].
FLOYD, CE ;
BAKER, JA ;
LO, JY ;
RAVIN, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (03) :857-861
[10]   QUANTITATIVE RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING USING A PHOTOSTIMULABLE PHOSPHOR SYSTEM [J].
FLOYD, CE ;
CHOTAS, HG ;
DOBBINS, JT ;
RAVIN, CE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (03) :454-459