PROSPECTIVE URODYNAMIC EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF PROSTATIC BALLOON DILATATION

被引:5
作者
GANABATHI, K [1 ]
ROSKAMP, D [1 ]
FOOTE, J [1 ]
ZIMMERN, PE [1 ]
LEACH, GE [1 ]
机构
[1] KAISER PERMANENTE MED CTR,DEPT UROL & URODYNAM,4900 SUNSET BLVD,LOS ANGELES,CA 90027
关键词
OUTFLOW OBSTRUCTION; BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; BALLOON DILATATION TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1002/nau.1930110504
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In order to evaluate the ability of transurethral prostatic balloon dilatation (TUPBD) to effectively treat prostatic obstruction, 18 men (aged 53-77 years) with obstructive small prostate glands were evaluated with symptom scores and urodynamic studies before and 6 and 12 months after TUPBD utilizing the endoscopically placed Advanced Surgical Intervention 75F balloon. After TUPBD, 81% of men reported some improvement in their symptoms with statistical significance (P < .05) at 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The mean non-invasive peak flow rate did not change significantly after TUPBD. Although the mean maximum voiding pressure (Pq max) and the maximum detrusor pressure at peak flow (Pq max) were reduced at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the changes were found to be statistically insignificant (P > .05). In addition, the use of Abrams and Griffiths pressure-flow nomogram revealed a "non-obstructive" pressure-flow study in only one patient at 6 and 12 after TUPBD. Although TUPBD results in some symptomatic improvement, on pressure-flow analysis the majority of men remain obstructed at 6 and 12 months after the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 495
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[51]  
Wein AJ, Evaluation of treatment response in benign prostatic hyperplasia, AUA update series, 10, pp. 66-72, (1991)
[52]  
Weiss JW, Badlani GH, Ravalli R, Manne J, Smith AD, Ballon dilatation of the prostate: Urodynamic assessment, J Urol Part 2, 143, (1990)
[53]  
Winfield HN, McCoy JG, Transurethral balloon dilation of the prostate: One year follow‐up, J Urol Part 2, 145, (1991)