CONCURRENT CHANGE IN PLANNED AND PREFERRED AGE FOR RETIREMENT

[11] HARRIS L, 1965, WASHINGTON POST 1128

[12] REJECTION OF RETIREE ROLE - STUDY OF FEMALE INDUSTRIAL WORKERS IN THEIR 50S [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1974, 27 (05) : 477 - 492

[13] LADD EC, 1977, CHRONICLE HIGHER ED, V15, P7

[14] PALMORE E, 1978, SOC FORCES, V57, P282

[15] PARNES HS, 1975, PRERETIREMENT YEARS, V4

[16] RELATIONSHIP OF SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES TO POPULATION SELECTION AND ATTRITION IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - CASE OF NORMATIVE AGING STUDY [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 1976, 16 (06) : 508 - 516

[17] AGING AND PREFERENCE FOR LATER RETIREMENT [J]. AGING AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1972, 3 (01): : 45 - 62

[18] *US DEP LAB, 1975, 186 LAB FORC REP

[19] *US DEP LAB, 1975, EMPL EARN, P21

[11] HARRIS L, 1965, WASHINGTON POST 1128

[12] REJECTION OF RETIREE ROLE - STUDY OF FEMALE INDUSTRIAL WORKERS IN THEIR 50S [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1974, 27 (05) : 477 - 492

[13] LADD EC, 1977, CHRONICLE HIGHER ED, V15, P7

[14] PALMORE E, 1978, SOC FORCES, V57, P282

[15] PARNES HS, 1975, PRERETIREMENT YEARS, V4

[16] RELATIONSHIP OF SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES TO POPULATION SELECTION AND ATTRITION IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - CASE OF NORMATIVE AGING STUDY [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 1976, 16 (06) : 508 - 516

[17] AGING AND PREFERENCE FOR LATER RETIREMENT [J]. AGING AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1972, 3 (01): : 45 - 62

[18] *US DEP LAB, 1975, 186 LAB FORC REP

[19] *US DEP LAB, 1975, EMPL EARN, P21