ADJUSTMENT FOR BIAS DUE TO ERRORS IN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENTS IN MULTICENTER COHORT STUDIES ON DIET AND CANCER - A CALIBRATION APPROACH

被引:49
作者
KAAKS, R
PLUMMER, M
RIBOLI, E
ESTEVE, J
VANSTAVEREN, W
机构
[1] WAGENINGEN UNIV AGR, DEPT HUMAN NUTR, WAGENINGEN, NETHERLANDS
[2] INST PUBL HLTH, MRC, BIOSTAT UNIT, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND
关键词
MULTICENTER COHORT STUDIES; DIET; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1093/ajcn/59.1.245S
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
An advantage of multicenter cohort studies on diet and cancer is that these may include populations over a wide range of dietary exposure. With some simplifying assumptions, the information from such multicenter studies may be divided into 1) estimated relationships within each of the separate cohorts, between individual-level measurements of dietary exposure and disease outcome, and 2) an estimated between-cohort relationship, between the mean intake measurements and mean incidence rates. Errors in the dietary exposure measurements may lead to different amounts of bias in each of these estimated relationships, in particular when dietary questionnaire methods cannot easily be standardized. A calibration approach can be used to adjust for such differences in bias. This will improve the relative weighting of within- and between-cohort components of evidence for a diet association.
引用
收藏
页码:245S / 250S
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AND CANCER INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO DIETARY PRACTICES [J].
ARMSTRONG, B ;
DOLL, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1975, 15 (04) :617-631
[2]  
BYERS T, 1988, CANCER, V62, P1713, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19881015)62:1+&lt
[3]  
1713::AID-CNCR2820621309&gt
[4]  
3.0.CO
[5]  
2-W
[6]   ECOLOGICAL VERSUS CASE-CONTROL STUDIES FOR TESTING A LINEAR-NO-THRESHOLD DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP [J].
COHEN, BL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 19 (03) :680-684
[7]   THE PROBLEM OF PROFOUND MISMEASUREMENT AND THE POWER OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL-STUDIES OF DIET AND CANCER [J].
FREUDENHEIM, JL ;
MARSHALL, JR .
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 1988, 11 (04) :243-250
[8]   A COMPARISON OF THE LOGISTIC RISK-FUNCTION AND THE PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL IN PROSPECTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES [J].
GREEN, MS ;
SYMONS, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1983, 36 (10) :715-724
[9]   DIVERGENT BIASES IN ECOLOGIC AND INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL STUDIES [J].
GREENLAND, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (09) :1209-1223
[10]   ECOLOGICAL BIAS, CONFOUNDING, AND EFFECT MODIFICATION [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
MORGENSTERN, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 18 (01) :269-274