AGRICULTURES SHARE IN THE EMISSION OF TRACE GASES AFFECTING THE CLIMATE AND SOME CAUSE-ORIENTED PROPOSALS FOR SUFFICIENTLY REDUCING THIS SHARE

This paper discusses agriculture's share in the world-wide emissions of climate-affecting gases and in the global warming potential (GWP). Proposals also are presented to reduce these emissions adequately, using a cause-oriented approach. Largely due to the fertilization and cultivation of agriculture as well as the burning of biomass, agriculture has a very high share in the anthropogenic emissions of NH3, N2O , CH4 and CO at >95%, 81%, 70% and 52%, respectively, while its share in the NO(x) and CO2, emissions is relatively small at 35% and 21%. The GWP of agriculture, based on annually 16.1 x 10(9) tons of CO2, approaches 63% of the GWP of the energy sector or 80% of the GWP of its CO2 emissions. At 34% and 32%, respectively, the main originators in the GWP of agriculture would seem to be CO2 (changing land use) and CH4 (animal husbandry/rice cropping/biomass burning) followed at 15% by NO2 (technical and biological N fixation/(cultivation and recultivation/biomass burning) and 10% and 9% by CO and NO(x). The GWP of 3 German dairy cows corresponds with 13.2 tonnes CO2 per year the GWP of two average German automobiles. However, the ozone-destroying effect of N2O and the climate-relevant effects of NH3 are not yet included here. As with the therapy for other 'modern' boundary-crossing environmental damages, such as acidification or eutrophication, global climate change therapy likewise needs a therapy for the respective effects of reactive compounds of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, and sulfur also emitted by agriculture: Proposals for reducing these emissions within the agricultural sector include need-oriented plant, animal and human nutrition, more efficient external and internal nutrient recycling, the cessation of further clearing by burning, along with intensified afforestation mainly in the tropics, targeted measures to reduce nutrient losses/emissions, and measures for more efficient use of nutrients in plant, animal and human nutrition. These measures would at best result in reduced pollution of the global environment but not put it to an end. Decisive, therefore, is both the tolerable extent of mankind and its long-term sustainable way of life.