TOTAL IV ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL AND THE LARYNGEAL MASK FOR ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY

被引:20
作者
DYER, RA [1 ]
LLEWELLYN, RL [1 ]
JAMES, MFM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CAPE TOWN,OBSERV,CAPE TOWN 7925,SOUTH AFRICA
关键词
ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES; IV INFUSION; ANESTHETICS IV; PROPOFOL; SURGERY; ORTHOPEDIC; EQUIPMENT; MASKS ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1093/bja/74.2.123
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
One hundred ASA I orthopaedic surgical patients (four randomized groups) were anaesthetized using continuous propofol and intermittent fentanyl (TIVA), with controlled ventilation via a tracheal tube in groups 1 and 2, and a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in groups 3 and 4. Neuromuscular blockers were used in groups 1 and 3 only. There were no significant differences between groups in total anaesthetic requirements,as assessed by cardiovascular variables and movement. Coughing interfered with surgery and made controlled ventilation difficult to manage. In contrast, movement not associated with coughing did not impair surgery or ventilation. Patients in group 2 (tracheal tube, no neuromuscular blocker) required more interventions for coughing than the other groups, while patients in group 4 (LMA, no neuromuscular blocker) needed more boluses for movement than groups 1 and 3. Groups 1 and 2 (tracheal tube) had significantly higher heart rates and mean arterial pressures than groups 3 and 4 for varying periods up to 5 min after insertion of the airway management device. There was no correlation between mean arterial pressure and plasma concentrations of catecholamines related to insertion of either the tracheal tube or LMA. The LMA was found to be a highly effective device for controlled ventilation in TIVA and easier to manage than the tracheal tube in the absence of neuromuscular blockers.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 128
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF INTUBATION FOLLOWING PROPOFOL AND ALFENTANIL WITH INTUBATION FOLLOWING THIOPENTONE AND SUXAMETHONIUM [J].
BECK, GN ;
MASTERSON, GR ;
RICHARDS, J ;
BUNTING, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (10) :876-880
[2]   THE PRESSOR-RESPONSE AND LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION - A COMPARISON WITH TRACHEAL INTUBATION [J].
BRAUDE, N ;
CLEMENTS, EAF ;
HODGES, UM ;
ANDREWS, BP .
ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (07) :551-554
[3]   HEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE CHANGES AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH EITHER THIOPENTONE OR PROPOFOL WITH SUXAMETHONIUM [J].
BROSSY, MJ ;
JAMES, MFM ;
JANICKI, PK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (05) :596-598
[4]  
FOLEY MR, 1989, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V71, P53
[5]  
FORBES AR, 1979, ANESTH ANALG, V58, P497
[6]   CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSE TO INSERTION OF BRAINS LARYNGEAL MASK [J].
HICKEY, S ;
CAMERON, AE ;
ASBURY, AJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (08) :629-633
[7]   CONTEXT-SENSITIVE HALF-TIME IN MULTICOMPARTMENT PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS FOR INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC DRUGS [J].
HUGHES, MA ;
GLASS, PSA ;
JACOBS, JR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (03) :334-341
[8]  
KEAVENY JP, 1988, ANAESTHESIA, V43, pS80
[9]   THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR INTRAOCULAR SURGERY - EFFECTS ON INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE AND STRESS RESPONSES [J].
LAMB, K ;
JAMES, MFM ;
JANICKI, PK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (02) :143-147
[10]   INTUBATION WITH PROPOFOL AUGMENTED WITH INTRAVENOUS LIGNOCAINE [J].
MULHOLLAND, D ;
CARLISLE, RJT .
ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (04) :312-313