THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PART TYPE DEMAND AND FMS LOADING POLICIES

被引:5
作者
MOHAMED, ZM
BERNADO, JJ
机构
[1] Department of Management, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY
[2] Department of Decision Sciences and Information Systems, College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00207549508904811
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, the resilience of loading policies to changes in part type demand is analysed. Two loading policies are compared: the maximum production rate policy and the minimum cost policy. The loading policies' resilience is measured by the operational flexibility that is imparted to the FMS by the policy when the FMS is faced with changes in the part type demand distributions. Results show that changes in part type demand do not statistically affect the resulting FMS makespan. However, as demand increases, the minimum cost policy imparts more routeing flexibility to the FMS than the maximum production rate policy. Likewise, as the demand decreases, the minimum cost policy results in a larger capacity flexibility measure than the maximum production rate policy. In summary, the minimum cost policy, while lowering inventory by as much as 48%, is found to increase system routeing flexibility by as much as 17% and capacity flexibility by 7% without statistically affecting planned makespan.
引用
收藏
页码:2197 / 2211
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ayres R.U., Ranta J., Warnecke H.-J., Flexible Metalworking Technologies, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2, (1992)
[2]  
Bernardo J.J., Mohamed Z.M., The measurement and use of operational flexibility in the loading of flexible manufacturing systems, European Journal of Operational Research, 60, 2, pp. 144-155, (1992)
[3]  
Berrada M., Stecke K.E., A branch and bound approach for machine loading in flexible manufacturing systems, Management Science, 32, 10, pp. 1316-1335, (1986)
[4]  
Carter M.F., Designing flexibility into automated manufacturing systems, Proceedings of the 2Nd ORSA/TIMS Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, pp. 107-118, (1986)
[5]  
Chakravarty A.K., Smtub A., Selecting parts and loading flexible manufacturing systems, Proceedings of the First ORSA/TIMS Conference on FMS, pp. 284-289, (1984)
[6]  
Co H., Biermann J.S., Chen S.K., A methodical approach to the flexible manufacturing system batching, loading, and tool configuration problems, International Journal of Production Research, 28, 12, pp. 2171-2186, (1990)
[7]  
Edgmill J.S., Creswell C., FMS control strategy—a survey of the determining characteristics, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems, pp. 305-315, (1985)
[8]  
Gerwin D., Do’s and don’ts of computerized manufacturing, Harvard Business Review, 60, 2, pp. 107-116, (1982)
[9]  
Greene T.J., Saeowski R., A mixed integer program for loading and scheduling multiple manufacturing cells, European Journal of Operational Research, 24, pp. 379-386, (1986)
[10]  
Gupta D., Buzacott J.A., A framework for understanding flexibility of manufacturing systems, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 8, 2, pp. 89-97, (1989)