CONTINGENT WEIGHTING IN JUDGMENT AND CHOICE

[21] CONTINGENT DECISION BEHAVIOR [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 92 (02) : 382 - 402

[22] SCHKADE DA, 1988, COGNITIVE PROCESSES

[23] LANGUAGES AND DESIGNS FOR PROBABILITY JUDGMENT [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1985, 9 (03) : 309 - 339

[24] SLOVIC P, 1983, AM ECON REV, V73, P596

[25] CHOICE BETWEEN EQUALLY VALUED ALTERNATIVES [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1975, 1 (03) : 280 - 287

[26] COMPARISON OF BAYESIAN AND REGRESSION APPROACHES TO STUDY OF INFORMATION PROCESSING IN JUDGMENT [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1971, 6 (06): : 649 - 744

[27] SLOVIC P, 1968, J EXPT PSYCHOL M 2 S, V78

[28] SLOVIC P, 1988, UNPUB COMPATIBILITY

[29] TVERSKY A, 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P327, DOI 10.1037/h0026750

[30] JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY - HEURISTICS AND BIASES [J]. SCIENCE, 1974, 185 (4157) : 1124 - 1131

[21] CONTINGENT DECISION BEHAVIOR [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 92 (02) : 382 - 402

[22] SCHKADE DA, 1988, COGNITIVE PROCESSES

[23] LANGUAGES AND DESIGNS FOR PROBABILITY JUDGMENT [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1985, 9 (03) : 309 - 339

[24] SLOVIC P, 1983, AM ECON REV, V73, P596

[25] CHOICE BETWEEN EQUALLY VALUED ALTERNATIVES [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1975, 1 (03) : 280 - 287

[26] COMPARISON OF BAYESIAN AND REGRESSION APPROACHES TO STUDY OF INFORMATION PROCESSING IN JUDGMENT [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1971, 6 (06): : 649 - 744

[27] SLOVIC P, 1968, J EXPT PSYCHOL M 2 S, V78

[28] SLOVIC P, 1988, UNPUB COMPATIBILITY

[29] TVERSKY A, 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P327, DOI 10.1037/h0026750

[30] JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY - HEURISTICS AND BIASES [J]. SCIENCE, 1974, 185 (4157) : 1124 - 1131