URINALYSIS VS BLOOD ANALYSIS, AS A TOOL FOR BIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF SOLVENT EXPOSURE

Blood and urine samples were collected at the end of an 8-h workshift from 30 male workers exposed to a mixture of n-hexane, ethyl acetate and toluene (each being about 2 ppm as geometric means) and also from 20 nonexposed male workers. Blood samples were analyzed for n-hexane and toluene, and urine samples were analyzed for n-hexane, toluene, 2,5-hexanedione (both with and without hydrolysis) and hippuric acid. Based on the correlation between biological exposure indicators and solvent concentrations in air, sensitivity as an exposure indicator was compared between solvents in blood and solvents or metabolites in urine in terms of the lowest solvent concentration at which the exposed subjects can be statistically separated from the nonexposed. Both n-hexane and toluene in blood were sensitive enough to detect the exposure at 6.1 ppm and 1.4 ppm, respectively. n-Hexane exposure below 2 ppm was detectable also by urinalysis for 2,5-hexadione without hydrolysis. Urinary hippuric acid, however, failed to detect low toluene exposure under the conditions studied. Of additional interest is the fact that toluene in urine correlated significantly with toluene in air, which apparently deserves further study for confirmation.