CORONARY VASCULAR RESERVE IN HUMANS - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF METHODS OF EVALUATION AND OF INTERPRETATION OF THE RESULTS

被引:34
作者
NITENBERG, A
ANTONY, I
机构
关键词
CORONARY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY RESERVE;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/16.suppl_I.7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The concept of coronary vascular reserve stems from the description of coronary autoregulation by Mosher in 1964. Schematically, the coronary blood flow at rest depends on the dterminants of myocardial oxygen demand (heart rate, contractility and ventricular load). If maximal coronary vasodilation is produced, it results in a linear and steep pressure-flow relationship. The increment of coronary flow above its basal value is called the coronary flow reserve, which indicates the flow added to the basal flow for a given coronary perfusion pressure when the coronary vascular bed is maximally dilated. Thus, in the absence of epicardial coronary artery stenosis, the maximal coronary flow is function of the coronary perfusion pressure and of the maximal surface area of the coronary circulation at the resistance vessel level. Evaluation of the coronary reserve in humans raises three major concerns: (1) methods for measuring or evaluating coronary flow are imprecise and inconvenient (diffusible indicators), invasive (coronary sinus thermodilution, intracoronary Doppler), expensive and require sophisticated technology (ultrafast computed tomography, positron emision tomography), or in the process of being validated (contrast echocardiography, transoesophageal doppler echocardiography, myocardial scintigraphy); (2) the compounds used to produce maximal coronary vasodilation are administered either by the intracoronary route (papaverine) or intravenously (dipyridamole, adenosine); (3) how to interpret the date: is the alteration of the coronary reserve due to a modification of the basal coronary flow or/and of the maximal coronary flow? Have the haemodynamic conditions changed between the measurement of the basal and maximal flow? Thus, each method has its own limitations and constraints that must be taken into account in order to avoid crude misinterpretations. In conclusion, the measurement of coronary reserve may be an important means of understanding coronary physiology and pathophysiloogy. recently developed non-invasive methods (ultrafast computed tomography, position emission tomography, echography) and the ability to produce maximal coronary vasoditlation by the intravenous route are promising.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 21
页数:15
相关论文
共 138 条
[51]   ENDOTHELIUM DETERMINES FLOW-DEPENDENT DILATION OF THE EPICARDIAL CORONARY-ARTERY IN DOGS [J].
INOUE, T ;
TOMOIKE, H ;
HISANO, K ;
NAKAMURA, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 11 (01) :187-191
[52]  
KAUFMAN J, 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, V19, p293A
[53]   MYOCARDIAL CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN HUMANS .2. ASSESSMENT OF CORONARY BLOOD-FLOW RESERVE [J].
KELLER, MW ;
GLASHEEN, W ;
SMUCKER, ML ;
BURWELL, LR ;
WATSON, DD ;
KAUL, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 12 (04) :925-934
[54]  
KEMPER AJ, 1984, ECHOCARDIOGR-J CARD, V1, P495
[55]  
KETY SS, 1951, PHARMACOL REV, V3, P1
[56]   STABILITY OF HETEROGENEITY OF MYOCARDIAL BLOOD-FLOW IN NORMAL AWAKE BABOONS [J].
KING, RB ;
BASSINGTHWAIGHTE, JB ;
HALES, JRS ;
ROWELL, LB .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1985, 57 (02) :285-295
[57]   DIPYRIDAMOLE INHIBITION OF ADENOSINE METABOLISM IN HUMAN-BLOOD [J].
KLABUNDE, RE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 93 (1-2) :21-26
[58]   MEASUREMENTS OF CORONARY FLOW RESERVE - DEFINING PATHOPHYSIOLOGY VERSUS MAKING DECISIONS ABOUT PATIENT-CARE [J].
KLOCKE, FJ .
CIRCULATION, 1987, 76 (06) :1183-1189
[59]   AVERAGE CORONARY BLOOD-FLOW PER UNIT WEIGHT OF LEFT-VENTRICLE IN PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE [J].
KLOCKE, FJ ;
BUNNELL, IL ;
GREENE, DG ;
WITTENBERG, SM ;
VISCO, JP .
CIRCULATION, 1974, 50 (03) :547-559
[60]   MEASUREMENTS OF CORONARY BLOOD-FLOW AND DEGREE OF STENOSIS - CURRENT CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS AND CONTINUING UNCERTAINTIES [J].
KLOCKE, FJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1983, 1 (01) :31-41