MOOD IS A COMPONENT OF MENTAL CONTEXT - COMMENT ON EICH (1995)

被引:18
作者
SMITH, SM
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Texas A and M University, College Station
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0096-3445.124.3.309
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
E. Eich (1995) found that participants' ratings of the similarity of their feelings at input and test sessions predicted the size of the observed place dependent memory effect and that a mood manipulation affected recall more than did a place manipulation. He concluded that mood dependence is the underlying cause of place dependence (and possibly of drug-state dependent memory). This conclusion assumes that mood states are transsituationally identical and that a mood can cue all associated memories, regardless of how the mood is achieved. An alternative explanation of Eich's results, the mental context hypothesis, views mood, place, mental set, and other factors as components of one's mental context, any of which can serve to cue the representation of mental context at test. In this light, Eich's results can be interpreted as showing that mood is a more reliable determinant than place of one's mental context.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 310
页数:2
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Bower G.H., 1992, HDB EMOTION MEMORY R, P3
[2]  
Bower GH., 1972, CODING PROCESS HUM, V3, P85
[3]   MOOD AS A MEDIATOR OF PLACE DEPENDENT MEMORY [J].
EICH, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1995, 124 (03) :293-308
[4]  
Kintsch W., 1974, REPRESENTATION MEANI
[5]   HOW DO WE KNOW THAT WE KNOW - THE ACCESSIBILITY MODEL OF THE FEELING OF KNOWING [J].
KORIAT, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (04) :609-639
[6]  
KORIAT A, 1994, METACOGNITION KNOWIN, P115
[7]  
McGeoch JA., 1942, PSYCHOL HUMAN LEARNI
[8]   A COMPARISON OF 2 TECHNIQUES FOR REDUCING CONTEXT-DEPENDENT FORGETTING [J].
SMITH, SM .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1984, 12 (05) :477-482
[9]   REMEMBERING IN AND OUT OF CONTEXT [J].
SMITH, SM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1979, 5 (05) :460-471
[10]   ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT-DEPENDENT HOMOPHONE SPELLING [J].
SMITH, SM ;
HEATH, FR ;
VELA, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 103 (02) :229-242