EYESPOT DEVELOPMENT ON BUTTERFLY WINGS - THE FOCAL SIGNAL

被引:91
作者
FRENCH, V [1 ]
BRAKEFIELD, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] LEIDEN UNIV, INST EVOLUTIONARY & ECOL SCI, 2313 ZT LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1006/dbio.1995.1065
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The eyespot colour pattern on butterfly wings is specified in the early pupal epidermis by signals from a central ''focus.'' In Bicyclus anynana we show that a small square of focal epidermis, grafted to a range of distal wing sites, induces eyespot formation in surrounding host tissue. Signaling is limited to the focus, and even an adjacent (parafocal) graft does not maintain its normal fate (of contributing to the eyespot) and does not influence its surroundings. Along the wing, there is an abrupt change in the epidermis, as a focus grafted to a proximal site provokes no host response. The results of several grafting experiments demonstrate that their different response properties are autonomous to small areas of the distal and proximal epidermis and that the nonresponding proximal tissue can nonetheless transmit the focal signal. The Bicyclus dorsal forewing has a small anterior and a large posterior eyespot, and we show that this results mainly from a difference in focal signals, not in the epidermal response. A grafted posterior focus induces a large eyespot, whereas an anterior focus induces a small eyespot. Furthermore, the anterior and posterior eyespots differ in proportions, and this difference also depends on the identity of the focus, not on the responding epidermis. Eyespots are specified over many cell diameters from the focus by a mechanism which could consist of one long-range signal, such as a morphogen gradient or of a cascade of short-range interactions initiated by the focus. Focal control of the difference in size and proportion between the anterior and posterior eyespot is more readily compatible with a gradient mechanism. Neither model, however, readily explains why the pattern induced by a grafted focus is smaller, but its peripheral gold annulus is broader than in the corresponding control eyespot. Also, there is no direct evidence for long-range gradients, in the butterfly wing or any other insect epithelium. (C) 1995 Academic Press,Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 123
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
Nijhout H. F., 1991, DEV EVOLUTION BUTTER
[22]  
NIJHOUT HF, 1985, J EMBRYOL EXP MORPH, V86, P191
[23]   PATTERN FORMATION ON LEPIDOPTERAN WINGS - DETERMINATION OF AN EYESPOT [J].
NIJHOUT, HF .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1980, 80 (02) :267-274
[24]   A COMPREHENSIVE MODEL FOR COLOR PATTERN-FORMATION IN BUTTERFLIES [J].
NIJHOUT, HF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1990, 239 (1294) :81-+
[25]  
Sander K., 1976, Advances in insect physiology. Volume 12., P125, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60255-6
[26]  
Spemann H., 1938, EMBRYONIC DEV INDUCT
[27]   ORGANIZING ACTIVITY OF WINGLESS PROTEIN IN DROSOPHILA [J].
STRUHL, G ;
BASLER, K .
CELL, 1993, 72 (04) :527-540
[28]   HEDGEHOG IS A SIGNALING PROTEIN WITH A KEY ROLE IN PATTERNING DROSOPHILA IMAGINAL DISKS [J].
TABATA, T ;
KORNBERG, TB .
CELL, 1994, 76 (01) :89-102
[29]   ORGANIZATION OF WING FORMATION AND INDUCTION OF A WING-PATTERNING GENE AT THE DORSAL/VENTRAL COMPARTMENT BOUNDARY [J].
WILLIAMS, JA ;
PADDOCK, SW ;
VORWERK, K ;
CARROLL, SB .
NATURE, 1994, 368 (6469) :299-305
[30]   POSITIONAL INFORMATION AND SPATIAL PATTERN OF CELLULAR DIFFERENTIATION [J].
WOLPERT, L .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1969, 25 (01) :1-&