2 MECHANISMS FOR LOCALIZATION - EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATION-DEPENDENT AND SEPARATION-INDEPENDENT PROCESSING OF POSITION INFORMATION

被引:55
作者
BURBECK, CA
YAP, YL
机构
[1] Visual Sciences Program, SRI International, Menlo Park
关键词
Eccentricity; Periphery; Separation discrimination; Size; Spatial summation; Spatial vision; Temporal summation;
D O I
10.1016/0042-6989(90)90099-7
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The Weber function for separation-i.e. Δs as a function of separation s3-is typically measured using a pair of targets presented roughly symmetrically relative to the fovea. With this paradigm, as the separation increases, the eccentricity of the individual targets increases also. To disentangle the effects of separation and eccentricity on the Weber function for separation, we systematically examined each of these variables and also examined the effects of target size and exposure duration. Separation discrimination thresholds were measured for average separations from 3 to 6 deg across a wide range of eccentricities, and for eccentricities of 2.5-10 deg for a range of separations. The dependence of threshold on target size was measured by varying the length of the stimuli from 1 to 120 min arc; the dependence on exposure duration was measured using durations of 100 and 500 msec at 10 deg eccentricity for comparison with data collected previously at smaller eccentricities. We found that for separations less than the eccentricity of the targets, thresholds depend primarily on separation; for larger separations, thresholds depend solely on eccentricity. In general, unless the targets are very small or quite brief, the spatial and temporal characteristics of the targets are not major contributors to the slope of the Weber function. Two mechanisms are proposed to account for thresholds in the two regions, one separation-dependent and one separation-independent. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 750
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   PERIPHERAL VISUAL ACUITY - WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SCOTOPIC ILLUMINATION [J].
MANDELBAUM, J ;
SLOAN, LL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1947, 30 (05) :581-588
[22]   OPPONENT MODEL FOR LINE INTERVAL DISCRIMINATION - INTERVAL AND VERNIER PERFORMANCE COMPARED [J].
MORGAN, MJ ;
REGAN, D .
VISION RESEARCH, 1987, 27 (01) :107-&
[23]   SPATIAL AND SPATIAL-FREQUENCY PRIMITIVES IN SPATIAL-INTERVAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
MORGAN, MJ ;
WARD, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (07) :1205-1210
[24]  
PALMER J, 1987, J OPT SOC AM A, V4, P22
[25]   ESTIMATION AND APPLICATION OF THE HUMAN CORTICAL MAGNIFICATION FACTOR [J].
ROVAMO, J ;
VIRSU, V .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1979, 37 (03) :495-510
[26]   CORTICAL MAGNIFICATION FACTOR PREDICTS PHOTOPIC CONTRAST SENSITIVITY OF PERIPHERAL-VISION [J].
ROVAMO, J ;
VIRSU, V ;
NASANEN, R .
NATURE, 1978, 271 (5640) :54-56
[27]   CHANGES IN APPARENT LENGTHS OF LINES AS A FUNCTION OF DEGREE OF RETINAL ECCENTRICITY [J].
SCHNEIDER, B ;
EHRLICH, DJ ;
STEIN, R ;
FLAUM, M ;
MANGEL, S .
PERCEPTION, 1978, 7 (02) :215-223
[28]   LOCAL SPATIAL SCALE FOR 3-DOT ALIGNMENT ACUITY [J].
TOET, A ;
SNIPPE, HP ;
KOENDERINK, JJ .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1988, 59 (4-5) :319-323
[29]   SCALE INVARIANT FEATURES OF DIFFERENTIAL SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT DISCRIMINATION [J].
TOET, A ;
VANEEKHOUT, MP ;
SIMONS, HLJ ;
KOENDERINK, JJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1987, 27 (03) :441-451
[30]   DIFFERENTIAL SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLDS FOR GABOR PATCHES [J].
TOET, A ;
KOENDERINK, JJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1988, 28 (01) :133-&