CEREBRAL HEMODYNAMICS DURING CAROTID CROSS-CLAMPING

被引:16
作者
PISTOLESE, GR
IPPOLITI, A
APPOLLONI, A
RONCHEY, S
FARAGLIA, V
机构
[1] I Cattedra di Chirurgia Vascolare, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY | 1993年 / 7卷
关键词
CAROTID SURGERY; CROSS-CLAMPING ISCHEMIA; CEREBRAL ISCHEMIA PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80951-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Carotid artery cross-clamping ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) causes 5-30% of perioperative neurological deficits. This study was performed to identify possible clinical situations at higher risk for carotid cross-clamping ischaemia. 606 consecutive patients underwent CEA and were retrospectively studied; they were grouped according to risk factors, presence of associated vascular diseases, clinical pattern, angiographic and CT scan findings. Stump pressure measurement was provided in all patients, perioperative monitoring during CEA was performed by electroencephalogram (EEG) in 469 (77%) and somatosensorial evoked potentials (SEP) in 137 (23%). Local anaesthesia was used in 88 (14.5%) patients. Ischaemic changes during carotid cross-clamping were registered in 118 patients (19.5%). The incidence of cross-clamping ischaemia was then related to different factors; it affected 5.6% of asymptomatics, 25.4% of patients with fixed stroke and 38.5% of those with stenosis and contralateral occlusion. Angiographic and clinical correlation showed that patients with more severe lesions are mostly affected by clamping ischaemia (up to 55% in those with stroke and stenosis with contralateral occlusion). Age, hypertension and diabetes do not significantly affect incidence of ischaemic changes. Positive CT scan increased this risk; statistical relevance was found in, regard to patients with unilateral or bilateral stenosis and in those with transient ischaemic attacks. A higher risk can be expected for subjects with more severe clinical and instrumental findings, even if no patients can be considered completely at risk or risk free. Perioperative monitoring is always mandatory and is of great importance in detecting ischaemic changes and preventing cerebral damage using a temporary intraluminal shunt. © 1993 Grune & Stratton Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]  
Boysen, Engell, Pistolese, Fiorani, Agnoli, Lassen, On the critical lower level of cerebral blood flow in man with particular reference to carotid surgery, Circulation, 49, pp. 1023-1025, (1974)
[12]  
Jones, Morawetz, Crowell, Et al., Threshold of focal ischemia in awake monkeys, J Neurosurg, 54, pp. 773-782, (1982)
[13]  
Donegan, Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy, Anesthesia, 3, pp. 1621-1642, (1986)
[14]  
Kaestler, Diabetes mellitus and cerebrovascular disease: prevalence of carotid artery occlusive disease and associated risk factors in 482 adult diabetic patients, Diabetes Care, 6, pp. 274-278, (1983)
[15]  
Fiorani, Pistolese, Ventura, Et al., Predictive value of CT scan evaluation in carotid surgery, Diagnostic Techniques and Assessment Procedures in Vascular Surgery, pp. 151-159, (1985)
[16]  
Moore, Yee, Hall, Collateral cerebral blood pressure: an index of tolerance to temporary carotid occlusion, Arch Surg, 106, pp. 520-522, (1973)
[17]  
Norris, Krajewski, Bornstein, The clinical role of the cerebral collateral circulation in carotid occlusion, J Vase Surg, 12, pp. 113-118, (1990)
[18]  
Powers, Cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease, Ann Neurol, 29, 3, pp. 231-240, (1991)
[19]  
Levine, Dobkin, Rozental, Et al., Blood flow reactivity to hypercapnia in strictly unilateral carotid disease: preliminary results, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 54, 3, pp. 204-209, (1991)
[20]  
Derouesne, Seuil d'ischémie cérébrale. Variabilite et labilité, Aggressologie, 27, 7, (1986)