THE EFFECT OF IMAGE-PROCESSING ON CHEST RADIOGRAPH INTERPRETATIONS IN A PACS ENVIRONMENT

被引:11
作者
ROSENTHAL, MS [1 ]
GOOD, WF [1 ]
COSTAGRECO, MA [1 ]
MIKETIC, LM [1 ]
EELKEMA, EA [1 ]
GUR, D [1 ]
ROCKETTE, HE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV PITTSBURGH,DEPT BIOSTAT,PITTSBURGH,PA 15261
关键词
Digital radiology; Image processing; Observer performance; Pacs; Resolution; Roc; Visual perception;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199008000-00005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The question of whether image processing affects a radiologist's diagnostic performance is becoming more important as the digital modalities proliferate. In the multi-observer study reported, the performance of radiologists who interpret a series of posteroanterior digitized chest images displayed on a highresolution workstation, with and without a set of image processing options, is determined. These include brightness, contrast, reverse look-up tables (black-bone), and two edge enhancement options. Three hundred images were evaluated twice (once in each mode) by each of seven board-certified radiologists, who recorded their confidence ratings for the presence or absence of one or more of the following abnormalities: interstitial disease, nodule, and pneumothorax. The original, unprocessed digital image was available for reference for those sessions in which the processing options were available. With the exception of one reader, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two modes (with and without processing) for the detection of any of the different abnormalities by individual readers. Likewise, the group as a whole showed no significant difference (P < .05) for detection of any of the three abnormalities between the two reading modes. © Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 901
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF UNSHARP MASKING AND SLIT SCANNING TECHNIQUES IN CHEST RADIOGRAPHY [J].
ARMSTRONG, JD ;
SORENSON, JA ;
NELSON, JA ;
TOCINO, I ;
LESTER, PD ;
JANES, JO ;
NIKLASON, LT ;
STANISH, W .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 147 (02) :351-356
[2]   VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .2. SIGNAL-LOCATION IDENTIFICATION [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
GHANDEHARIAN, H .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1984, 1 (08) :906-910
[3]   THE EFFECT OF CLINICAL HISTORY ON CHEST RADIOGRAPH INTERPRETATIONS IN A PACS ENVIRONMENT [J].
COOPERSTEIN, LA ;
GOOD, BC ;
EELKEMA, EA ;
SUMKIN, JH ;
TABOR, EK ;
SIDOROVICH, K ;
CURTIN, HD ;
YOUSEM, SA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (06) :670-674
[4]   DETECTION OF PNEUMOTHORAX - COMPARISON OF DIGITAL AND CONVENTIONAL CHEST IMAGING [J].
FAJARDO, LL ;
HILLMAN, BJ ;
POND, GD ;
CARMODY, RF ;
JOHNSON, JE ;
FERRELL, WR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 152 (03) :475-480
[5]   STORAGE PHOSPHOR RADIOGRAPHS VS CONVENTIONAL FILMS - INTERPRETERS PERCEPTIONS OF DIAGNOSTIC QUALITY [J].
FUHRMAN, CR ;
GUR, D ;
GOOD, B ;
ROCKETTE, H ;
COOPERSTEIN, LA ;
FEIST, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 150 (05) :1011-1014
[6]   DIGITAL IMAGE-PROCESSING - EFFECT ON DETECTABILITY OF SIMULATED LOW-CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHIC PATTERNS [J].
ISHIDA, M ;
DOI, K ;
LOO, LN ;
METZ, CE ;
LEHR, JL .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 150 (02) :569-575
[7]   CHEST RADIOGRAPHS OBTAINED WITH SHAPED FILTERS - EVALUATION BY OBSERVER PERFORMANCE TESTS [J].
KELSEY, CA ;
LANE, RG ;
MOSELEY, RD ;
METTLER, FA ;
ROSENBERG, RD ;
WILLIAMS, AG ;
GARCIA, JF ;
FELDMAN, BS ;
BOARDMAN, RE .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 159 (03) :653-655
[8]   DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY - EFFECT ON DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF HARD COPY, CONVENTIONAL VIDEO, AND REVERSED GRAY SCALE VIDEO DISPLAY FORMATS [J].
MACMAHON, H ;
METZ, CE ;
DOI, K ;
KIM, T ;
GIGER, ML ;
CHAN, HP .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (03) :669-673
[10]   SUBTLE LUNG CANCERS - IMPACT OF EDGE ENHANCEMENT AND GRAY SCALE REVERSAL ON DETECTION WITH DIGITIZED CHEST RADIOGRAPHS [J].
OESTMANN, JW ;
KUSHNER, DC ;
BOURGOUIN, PM ;
LLEWELLYN, HJ ;
MOCKBEE, BW ;
GREENE, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (03) :657-658