QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF REINFORCEMENT RELATIVITY

[11] Miller Neal E., 1951, HDB EXPT PSYCHOL, P435

[12] RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1974, 21 (03) : 389 - 408

[13] TOWARD EMPIRICAL BEHAVIOR LAWS .1. POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1959, 66 (04) : 219 - 233

[14] REVERSIBILITY OF REINFORCEMENT RELATION [J]. SCIENCE, 1962, 136 (3512) : 255 - &

[15] Premack D, 1965, NEBRASKA S MOTIVATIO, P123

[16] Premack D., 1971, NATURE REINFORCEMENT, P121

[17] LICKING RATES IN INFANT ALBINO RATS [J]. SCIENCE, 1961, 134 (349) : 1980 - &

[18] SKINNER BF, 1953, SCI HUMAN BEHAVIOR

[19] Smith K., 1974, BEHAVIORISM, V2, P124

[20] SPENCE K, 1956, BEHAVIOR THEORY COND

[11] Miller Neal E., 1951, HDB EXPT PSYCHOL, P435

[12] RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1974, 21 (03) : 389 - 408

[13] TOWARD EMPIRICAL BEHAVIOR LAWS .1. POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1959, 66 (04) : 219 - 233

[14] REVERSIBILITY OF REINFORCEMENT RELATION [J]. SCIENCE, 1962, 136 (3512) : 255 - &

[15] Premack D, 1965, NEBRASKA S MOTIVATIO, P123

[16] Premack D., 1971, NATURE REINFORCEMENT, P121

[17] LICKING RATES IN INFANT ALBINO RATS [J]. SCIENCE, 1961, 134 (349) : 1980 - &

[18] SKINNER BF, 1953, SCI HUMAN BEHAVIOR

[19] Smith K., 1974, BEHAVIORISM, V2, P124

[20] SPENCE K, 1956, BEHAVIOR THEORY COND