PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF HIGH-DOSE AND STANDARD-DOSE ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH EXTENSIVE-STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER

被引:220
作者
IHDE, DC
MULSHINE, JL
KRAMER, BS
STEINBERG, SM
LINNOILA, RI
GAZDAR, AF
EDISON, M
PHELPS, RM
LESAR, M
PHARES, JC
GRAYSON, J
MINNA, JD
JOHNSON, BE
机构
[1] NCI, USN, MED ONCOL BRANCH, RADIAT ONCOL BRANCH, BETHESDA, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, BIOSTAT & DATA MANAGEMENT SECT, BETHESDA, MD USA
[3] NATL NAVAL MED CTR, DEPT MED, BETHESDA, MD USA
[4] UNIFORMED SERV UNIV HLTH SCI, DEPT RADIOL, BETHESDA, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We performed a prospective randomized clinical trial to determine whether higher doses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) yield more complete responses or longer survival in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Patients and Methods: Ninety patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC: fulfilled criteria for randomization to standard dose versus high-dose EP. Another 25 patients at risk of excessive toxicity from high-dose treatment were given standard-dose therapy. During cycles 1 and 2 of EP, patients on standard-dose treatment received intravenous etoposide 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks; high-dose treatment consisted of etoposide 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 and cisplatin 27 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 every 3 weeks. All patients received standard-dose EP in cycles 3 and 4. In cycles 5 through 8, completely responding patients continued standard-dose EP; all other patients received either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine, or (if possible) a combination drug program based on in vitro drug sensitivity testing of tumor-cell lines established from individual patients. Results: Despite 68% higher doses and a 46% higher dose-rate intensity actually given to patients randomized to receive high-dose relative to chose randomised to receive standard-dose EP, complete response rates (23% v 22%; P = .99) and median survival durations (10.7 and 11.4 months, respectively; P = .68) were virtually identical. Complete responses occurred in 4% of patients and the median survival duration was 5.8 months in nonrandomized patients. Leukopenia (P < .0001), thrombocytopenia (P < .0001), febrile neutropenia (P = .01), and weight loss (P = .02) were significantly more common in patients randomized to receive high-dose compared with standard-dose EP. Conclusion: No therapeutic benefits resulted from increasing planned doses by 67% for the first two cycles of EP in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. Higher doses were associated with substantially worse toxicities.
引用
收藏
页码:2022 / 2034
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[51]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY-V A HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMEN IN THE TREATMENT OF POOR PROGNOSIS NONSEMINOMATOUS GERM-CELL TUMORS [J].
OZOLS, RF ;
IHDE, DC ;
LINEHAN, WM ;
JACOB, J ;
OSTCHEGA, Y ;
YOUNG, RC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (06) :1031-1040
[52]  
PORTER LL, 1985, CANCER TREAT REP, V69, P479
[53]  
RADICE PA, 1982, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V50, P2894, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19821215)50:12<2894::AID-CNCR2820501232>3.0.CO
[54]  
2-G
[55]   RANDOMIZED STUDY OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND VINCRISTINE VERSUS ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN VERSUS ALTERNATION OF THESE 2 REGIMENS IN EXTENSIVE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A PHASE-III TRIAL OF THE SOUTHEASTERN CANCER STUDY-GROUP [J].
ROTH, BJ ;
JOHNSON, DH ;
EINHORN, LH ;
SCHACTER, LP ;
CHERNG, NC ;
COHEN, HJ ;
CRAWFORD, J ;
RANDOLPH, JA ;
GOODLOW, JL ;
BROUN, GO ;
OMURA, GA ;
GRECO, FA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (02) :282-291
[56]   PLANNING THE DURATION OF A COMPARATIVE CLINICAL-TRIAL WITH LOSS TO FOLLOW-UP AND A PERIOD OF CONTINUED OBSERVATION [J].
RUBINSTEIN, LV ;
GAIL, MH ;
SANTNER, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1981, 34 (9-10) :469-479
[57]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE 4 MOST ACTIVE REGIMENS FOR METASTATIC NON SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
RUCKDESCHEL, JC ;
FINKELSTEIN, DM ;
ETTINGER, DS ;
CREECH, RH ;
MASON, BA ;
JOSS, RA ;
VOGL, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 4 (01) :14-22
[58]  
SCHABEL FM, 1979, CANCER TREAT REP, V63, P1459
[59]  
SCHER H, 1985, 4TH P WORLD C LUNG C, P95
[60]  
SIMON RM, 1989, CANCER PRINCIPLES PR, P396