OBSERVATIONAL PURPOSE AND EVALUATIVE ARTICULATION IN FRAME-OF-REFERENCE TRAINING - THE EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE PROCESSING MODES ON RATING ACCURACY

被引:18
作者
CARDY, RL [1 ]
KEEFE, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] INDIANA UNIV,DIV BUSINESS & ECON,BLOOMINGTON,IN 47401
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.1994.1019
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The influence of observational purpose and the degree of articulation in raters' judgment processes on attention, recognition, and rating was investigated in a sample of 120 student raters who read behavioral descriptions of college professor classroom performance. It was hypothesized that observation for purposes of either memorization or impression formation and classification of ratee behaviors into two, three, or five levels of performance would influence attention time, recognition accuracy, and rating accuracy measures. Results revealed no effects on attention time or recognition accuracy, but did indicate a significant observational purpose by articulation interaction. Complex articulation resulted in more accurate ratings than did a simple level of evaluative articulation, but only when subjects were in an impression formation, rather than memorization, mode of processing. The pattern of results is interpreted as indicating the importance of the schematic basis for processing that a rater brings to a rating situation. The possibility of cognitive structural characteristics being more important for performance ratings than processing characteristics is also raised by the pattern of results. Directions for future research and the practical implications of the results are also discussed. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 357
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]  
Lord R. G., 1982, LEADERSHIP ESTABLISH, P104
[33]  
LUMSDEN J, 1976, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, P251
[34]   A COMPARISON OF HOLISTIC AND DECOMPOSED JUDGMENT STRATEGIES IN A PERFORMANCE RATING SIMULATION [J].
LYNESS, KS ;
CORNELIUS, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1982, 29 (01) :21-38
[35]  
MCINTYRE RM, 1984, J APPL PSYCHOL, V72, P240
[36]   EFFECT OF PURPOSE OF OBSERVATION ON ACCURACY OF IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED PERFORMANCE RATINGS [J].
MURPHY, KR ;
PHILBIN, TA ;
ADAMS, SR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1989, 43 (03) :336-354
[37]   EFFECTS OF THE PURPOSE OF RATING ON ACCURACY IN OBSERVING TEACHER-BEHAVIOR AND EVALUATING TEACHING PERFORMANCE [J].
MURPHY, KR ;
BALZER, WK ;
KELLAM, KL ;
ARMSTRONG, JG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 76 (01) :45-54
[38]  
Neisser U., 1967, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL
[40]   A COMPARISON OF GLOBAL JUDGMENT VS TASK ORIENTED APPROACHES TO JOB CLASSIFICATION [J].
SACKETT, PR ;
CORNELIUS, ET ;
CARRON, TJ .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 34 (04) :791-804