DOSE-RELATED CHANGES IN THE RATE OF CSF FORMATION AND RESISTANCE TO REABSORPTION OF CSF DURING ADMINISTRATION OF FENTANYL, SUFENTANIL, OR ALFENTANIL IN DOGS

被引:16
作者
ARTRU, AA
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
关键词
INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETICS; FENTANYL; SUFENTANIL; ALFENTANIL; BRAIN; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CSF FORMATION; PRESSURE; REABSORPTION; OPIOIDS;
D O I
10.1097/00008506-199112000-00008
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) formation (V(f)) and resistance to reabsorption (R(a)) of CSF were determined in dogs at four doses of fentanyl (0.05, 0.18, 0.60, and 3.0-mu-g . kg-1 . min-1), sufentanil (0.01, 0.04,0.13, and 0.60-mu-g . kg-1 . min-1) and aflentanil (1.4, 4.0, 13.0, and 40.0-mu-g . kg-1 . min-1). Results were compared within and between groups and to previously reported normal values (obtained during a variety of background anesthetics) for V(f) (0.030-0.054 ml/min) and R(a) (220-253 cm H2O ml-1 min) in dogs. At the two lower doses of fentanyl and at all doses of sufentanil and alfentanil, V(f) values were not significantly different from previously reported normal values. At the two higher doses of fentanyl, V(f) decreased by 24 and 49%, respectively. At the two lower doses of all three drugs, R(a) was significantly decreased, with mean values 40-52% below previously reported normal values. At the two higher doses of alfentanil, R(a) values were not significantly different from previously reported normal values, and at the two higher doses of fentanyl and sufentanil, R(a) was unchanged or increased. It is concluded that, among these three narcotics, reduction of CSF volume (as determined by the balance between V(f) and R(a)) is favored most by fentanyl, and ease of CSF volume contraction (as determined by R(a)) is favored most by alfentanil.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 290
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   EFFECTS OF ALFENTANIL ON CEREBRAL VASCULAR REACTIVITY IN DOGS [J].
MCPHERSON, RW ;
KREMPASANKA, E ;
EIMERL, D ;
TRAYSTMAN, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (12) :1232-1238
[32]  
MICHENFELDER JD, 1971, BRIT J ANAESTH, V43, P630, DOI 10.1093/bja/43.7.630
[33]  
MILDE LN, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V70, P138
[34]   THE ANESTHETIC POTENCY OF FENTANYL IN TERMS OF ITS REDUCTION OF ENFLURANCE MAC [J].
MURPHY, MR ;
HUG, CC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 57 (06) :485-488
[35]   EFFECT OF CERTAIN DRUGS ON CEREBROSPINAL FLUID PRODUCTION IN DOG [J].
OPPELT, WW ;
RALL, DP ;
PATLAK, CS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1964, 206 (02) :247-&
[36]  
OPPELT WW, 1966, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V154, P581
[37]   PERFUSION OF CEREBRAL VENTRICULAR SYSTEM IN UNANESTHETIZED GOATS [J].
PAPPENHEIMER, JR ;
JORDAN, EF ;
HEISEY, SR ;
DOWNER, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1962, 203 (05) :763-+
[38]  
SHAFER A, 1986, ANESTH ANALG, V65, P1021
[39]   COMPARISON BETWEEN HIGH-DOSE SUFENTANIL OXYGEN AND HIGH-DOSE FENTANYL OXYGEN FOR NEUROANESTHESIA [J].
SHUPAK, RC ;
HARP, JR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (04) :375-381
[40]  
Smith N T, 1985, J Clin Monit, V1, P236, DOI 10.1007/BF02832817