DIFFERENCES IN THE LEGIBILITY OF LETTERS AT CONTRAST THRESHOLD USING THE PELLI-ROBSON CHART

被引:66
作者
ELLIOTT, DB
WHITAKER, D
BONETTE, L
机构
[1] Clinical Vision Research Unit, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire
[2] Department of Vision Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, Aston Triangle
[3] Sidney Fraser(Opticians) Ltd., Bradford, West Yorkshire
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-1313.1990.tb00877.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
One disadvantage of using high‐contrast letters as test objects when measuring visual acuity is the fact that they are not of equal legibility. A number of charts are now commercially available that assess contrast sensitivity using letter targets. This study attempted to assess the legibility of letters at contrast threshold on the Pelli‐Robson letter contrast sensitivity chart by determining the percentage of correct responses for each of the ten Sloan letters at contrast threshold. Results of 493 contrast sensitivity measurements taken in optometric practice indicated that there is a definite difference in legibility between letters at contrast threshold as for letters at acuity threshold. The data suggest that the probability of correctly identifying two out of a group of three letters at threshold on the Pelli‐Robson chart varies between 67% and 97% due to letter type alone. Because of the very regular and pronounced miscalling of the letter C as an O, we suggest that this should be accepted as a correct call during threshold measurements on the Pelli‐Robson chart. This helps to balance the legibility of different groups of letters. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 326
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Bailey I.L., Lovie J.E., New design principles for visual acuity letter charts, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt., 53, pp. 740-745, (1976)
[2]  
Bennett A.G., Ophthalmic test types, Br. J. Physiol. Opt., 22, pp. 238-271, (1965)
[3]  
Ferris F.L., Kassof A., Bresnick G.H., Bailey I., New visual acuity charts for clinical research, Am. J. Ophthalmol., 94, pp. 91-96, (1982)
[4]  
Strong G., Woo G.C., A distance visual acuity chart incorporating some new design features, Arch. Ophthalmol., 103, pp. 44-46, (1985)
[5]  
Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity, Adv. Ophthalmol., 41, pp. 103-148, (1980)
[6]  
Sloan L.L., Rowland W.M., Altman A., Comparison of three types of test target for measurement of visual acuity, Q. Rev. Ophthalmol. Otorhinolaryngol., 8, pp. 4-17, (1952)
[7]  
Regan D., Low contrast letter charts and sine‐wave grating tests in opthalmological and neurological disorders, Clin. Vision Sci., 2, pp. 235-250, (1988)
[8]  
Pelli D.G., Robson J.G., Wilkins A.J., The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity, Clin. Vision Sci., 2, pp. 187-199, (1988)
[9]  
Greeves A.L., Cole B.L., Jacobs R.J., Assessment of contrast sensitivity of patients with macular disease using reduced contrast near visual acuity charts, Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., 8, pp. 371-377, (1988)
[10]  
Vaegan, Halliday B.L., A forced‐choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity, Br. J. Ophthalmol., 66, pp. 477-491, (1982)