MODEL STUDIES ON IRON(III) ION AFFINITY-CHROMATOGRAPHY .2. INTERACTION OF IMMOBILIZED IRON(III) IONS WITH PHOSPHORYLATED AMINO-ACIDS, PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS

被引:90
作者
MUSZYNSKA, G
DOBROWOLSKA, G
MEDIN, A
EKMAN, P
PORATH, JO
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA,CTR BIOCHEM SEPARAT,BOX 577,S-75123 UPPSALA,SWEDEN
[2] POLISH ACAD SCI,INST BIOCHEM & BIOPHYS,PL-02532 WARSAW,POLAND
[3] UNIV UPPSALA,DEPT BIOCHEM,S-75123 UPPSALA,SWEDEN
[4] UNIV UPPSALA,DEPT MED & PHYSIOL CHEM,S-75123 UPPSALA,SWEDEN
来源
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY | 1992年 / 604卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0021-9673(92)85524-W
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The chromatographic behaviour of phosphoamino acids, phosphopeptides and phosphoproteins and their non-phosphorylated counterparts was studied on Fe(III)-Chelating Sepharose(R) and Fe(III)-Chelating Superose(R). The phosphorylated compounds, in contrast to their non-phosphorylated or dephosphorylated counterparts, adsorb to immobilized iron(III) ions at pH 5.5 and can be desorbed by an increase in pH. Phosphoamino acids were eluted at pH 6.5-6.7, whereas monophosphopeptides and phosphoprotamine eluted in the pH range 6.9-7.5. Molecules possessing clusters(s) of carboxylic groups are weakly retained (gamma-carboxyglutamic acid, Ala-Ser-Glu5) or bound (polyglutamic acid, beta-casein) to the immobilized iron(III) ions at pH 5.5. Dephosphorylated beta-casein was desorbed at pH 7.0, whereas for elution of native (non-dephosphorylated) beta-casein, phosphate buffer of pH 7.7 was required. The homopolymer of polyglutamic acid was desorbed in the pH range 6.0-6.3, whereas copolymers of glutamic acid and tyrosine require pH 7.0-7.3 or even phosphate buffer at pH 7.7 for elution.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   ISOLATION OF PHOSPHOPROTEINS BY IMMOBILIZED METAL (FE-3+) AFFINITY-CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
ANDERSSON, L ;
PORATH, J .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1986, 154 (01) :250-254
[2]   IMMOBILIZED METAL-ION AFFINITY-CHROMATOGRAPHY - EFFECT OF SOLUTE STRUCTURE, LIGAND DENSITY AND SALT CONCENTRATION ON THE RETENTION OF PEPTIDES [J].
BELEW, M ;
PORATH, J .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1990, 516 (02) :333-354
[3]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[4]   MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF CAMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN-KINASE ACTION [J].
BRAMSON, HN ;
KAISER, ET ;
MILDVAN, AS .
CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOCHEMISTRY, 1984, 15 (02) :93-124
[5]  
CHAGA G, 1989, BIOTECHNOL APPL BIOC, V11, P424
[6]   CHARACTERIZATION OF MULTIPLE FORMS OF MAIZE SEEDLING PROTEIN-KINASES REMINISCENT OF ANIMAL CASEIN KINASES S (TYPE-1) AND TS (TYPE-2) [J].
DOBROWOLSKA, G ;
MEGGIO, F ;
PINNA, LA .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1987, 931 (02) :188-195
[7]  
DOBROWOLSKA G, 1986, J CHROMATOGR, V376, P421, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)80859-2
[8]  
DOBROWOLSKA G, 1990, J CHROMATOGR, V541, P333
[9]  
FLOTOW H, 1990, J BIOL CHEM, V265, P14264
[10]  
HATHAWAY GM, 1982, CURR TOP CELL REGUL, V21, P101